The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research
Abstract
Sustainability research that strives to develop solution options to complex problems and involves non-academic partners has received increasing public attention. Given this trend, funding organizations, universities, and collaborating partners from business and government seek evidence for the effectiveness of such research. The article introduces a framework and methodological scheme for capturing the societal effects of participatory sustainability research. The framework was developed through literature review and a workshop with institutional agents. It accounts for both direct and tangible as well as indirect and less tangible effects. Effects include quality products, knowledge gains, increased decision-making capacity, enhanced networks, and transformational changes. Participatory research features linked to these effects include representativeness of participants, adequate level of interaction, and transparent incorporation of stakeholder inputs. The framework is translated into a methodological scheme, which we discuss based on exploratory testing. The testing revealed a number of challenges, including adequately incentivizing participation and dealing with memory distortion. We propose coping strategies such as collaborative participant recruitment, memory consolidation activities, and real-time study design. The article provides a constructive, yet cautionary aid to researchers, professionals, and funding organizations seeking to capture the societal effects of participatory sustainability research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research
Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2 · Cited by 1,620
Co-Producing Sustainability: Reordering the Governance of Science, Policy, and Practice
Wyborn, C., Datta, A., Montana, J., Ryan, M., Leith, P., Chaffin, B., Miller, C., & van Kerkhoff, L. (2019) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103 · Cited by 485
Luederitz, C., Schäpke, N., Wiek, A., Lang, D. J., Bergmann, M., Bos, J. J., Burch, S., Davies, A., Evans, J., König, A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005 · Cited by 367
Self-citationPolk, M. (2014) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7 · Cited by 224
Newig, J., Jahn, S., Lang, D. J., Kahle, J., & Bergmann, M. (2019) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.008 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiek, A., Talwar, S., O'Shea, M., & Robinson, J.
- Venue
- Research Evaluation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-02-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-132
- ISSN
- 0958-2029 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5449
- OpenAlex
- W2149717149
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/reseval/rvt031
- The paper
- Wiek, A., Talwar, S., O'Shea, M., & Robinson, J. (2014). Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability research. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.