Cited by 754Game Theory and ApplicationsEconomic theories and modelsGame Theory and Voting Systems

Bayesian Learning in Social Networks

Acemoglu, D., Dahleh, M. A., Lobel, I., Ozdaglar, A.·2011·The Review of Economic Studies

Abstract

We study the (perfect Bayesian) equilibrium of a sequential learning model over a general social network. Each individual receives a signal about the underlying state of the world, observes the past actions of a stochastically generated neighbourhood of individuals, and chooses one of two possible actions. The stochastic process generating the neighbourhoods defines the network topology. We characterize pure strategy equilibria for arbitrary stochastic and deterministic social networks and characterize the conditions under which there will be asymptotic learning—convergence (in probability) to the right action as the social network becomes large. We show that when private beliefs are unbounded (meaning that the implied likelihood ratios are unbounded), there will be asymptotic learning as long as there is some minimal amount of “expansion in observations”. We also characterize conditions under which there will be asymptotic learning when private beliefs are bounded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/restud/rdr004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Communicating only with people who share similar ideology or opinion restricts beliefs and prevents learning the truth.

    “Communicating only with people who share similar ideology or opinion restricts beliefs and prevents learning the truth”

    From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Acemoglu et al., 2011

  • Increasing homophily leads people to be exposed to a narrow set of beliefs that conform to their existing beliefs.

    “Increasing homophily leads to situations where people are exposed to a narrow set of beliefs (Acemoglu et al., 2011(Acemoglu et al., , 2010) ) that conforms to their existing beliefs.”

    From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Acemoglu et al., 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acemoglu, D., Dahleh, M. A., Lobel, I., & Ozdaglar, A.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
The Review of Economic Studies
Published
2011-03-07
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
1201-1236
ISSN
  • 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-937X
OpenAlex
W3022273187
Cited by
754
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 37
FWCI
64.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Review of Economic Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
Keywords
Bayesian learning, social networks, perfect Bayesian equilibrium, sequential learning, asymptotic learning, personal beliefs, likelihood ratios, network topology, pure Nash equilibrium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review