The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industry Information Diffusion and the Lead-lag Effect in Stock Returns
Abstract
I argue that the slow diffusion of industry information is a leading cause of the lead-lag effect in stock returns. I find that the lead-lag effect between big firms and small firms is predominantly an intra-industry phenomenon. Moreover, this effect is driven by sluggish adjustment to negative information, and is robust to alternative determinants of the lead-lag effect. Small, less competitive and neglected industries experience a more pronounced lead-lag effect. The lead-lag effect is related to the post-announcement drift of small firms following the earnings releases of big firms within the industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests
Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260061 · Cited by 14,258
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency
JEGADEESH, N., & TITMAN, S. (1993) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x · Cited by 11,584
Constraints on short-selling and asset price adjustment to private information
Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1987) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(87)90042-0 · Cited by 1,919
Information Uncertainty and Stock Returns
ZHANG, X. F. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00831.x · Cited by 1,802
When Are Contrarian Profits Due to Stock Market Overreaction?
Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1990) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/3.2.175 · Cited by 1,704
Special Information and Insider Trading
Jaffe, J. F. (1974) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/295655 · Cited by 1,231
Market Frictions, Price Delay, and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
Hou, K., & Moskowitz, T. J. (2005) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhi023 · Cited by 1,083
Self-citationIndustry Concentration and Average Stock Returns
HOU, K., & ROBINSON, D. T. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00893.x · Cited by 906
Self-citationRisk and return: The case of merging firms
Mandelker, G. (1974) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(74)90012-9 · Cited by 868
Investment Analysis and the Adjustment of Stock Prices to Common Information
Brennan, M. J., Jegadeesh, N., & Swaminathan, B. (1993) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/6.4.799 · Cited by 639
Cited by
Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and Underreaction to Earnings News
HIRSHLEIFER, D., LIM, S. S., & TEOH, S. H. (2009) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01501.x · Cited by 1,542
Performance of technical analysis in growth and small cap segments of the US equity market
Shynkevich, A. (2012) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.07.001 · Cited by 108
Do Machine Learning Models Need to Be Sector Experts?
Hanauer, M. X., Soebhag, A., Stam, M., & Hoogteijling, T. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5224253 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Hou, K.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1113-1138
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W3125297504
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Industry Information Diffusion and the Lead-lag Effect in Stock Returns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/revfin/hhm003
- The paper
- Hou, K. (2007). Industry Information Diffusion and the Lead-lag Effect in Stock Returns. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/revfin/hhm003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.