The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A New Estimate of Transaction Costs
Abstract
Transaction costs are important for a host of empirical analyses from market efficiency to international market research. But transaction costs estimates are not always available, or where available, are cumbersome to use and expensive to purchase. We present a model that requires only the time series of daily security returns to endogenously estimate the effective transaction costs for any firm, exchange, or time period. The feature of the data that allows for the estimation of transaction costs is the incidence of zero returns. Incorporating zero returns in the return-generating process, the model provides continuous estimates of average round-trip transaction costs from 1963 to 1990 that are 1.2% and 10.3% for large and small decile firms, respectively. These estimates are highly correlated (85%), with the most commonly used transaction cost estimators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/ N Portfolio Strategy?
DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm075 · Cited by 3,199
Transparency, Liquidity, and Valuation: International Evidence on When Transparency Matters Most
LANG, M., LINS, K. V., & MAFFETT, M. (2012) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00442.x · Cited by 821
Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005) · Foundations and Trends® in Finance · doi:10.1561/0500000003 · Cited by 820
Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2013) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.10.007 · Cited by 816
Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences Around IAS/IFRS Adoptions
DASKE, H., HAIL, L., LEUZ, C., & VERDI, R. (2013) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12005 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Lesmond, D. A., Ogden, J. P., & Trzcinka, C. A.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1113-1141
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2104559023
- Cited by
- 1,338
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Estimate of Transaction Costs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/12.5.1113
- The paper
- Lesmond, D. A., Ogden, J. P., & Trzcinka, C. A. (1999). A New Estimate of Transaction Costs. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/12.5.1113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.