The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Closed-Form GARCH Option Valuation Model
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops a closed-form option valuation formula for a spot asset whose variance follows a GARCH(p,q) process that can be correlated with the returns of the spot asset. It provides the first readily computed option formula for a random volatility model that can be estimated and implemented solely on the basis of observables. The single lag version of this model contains Heston's (1993) stochastic volatility model as a continuous-time limit. Empirical analysis on S&P500 index options shows that the out-of-sample valuation errors from the single lag version of the GARCH model are substantially lower than the ad hoc Black-Scholes model of Dumas, Fleming and Whaley (1998) that uses a separate implied volatility for each option to fit to the smirk/smile in implied volatilties. The GARCH model remains superior even though the parameters of the GARCH model are held constant and volatility is filtered from the history of asset prices while the ad hoc Black-Scholes model is updated every period. The improvement is largely due to the ability of the GARCH model to simultaneously capture the correlation of volatility with spot returns and the path dependence in volatility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260062 · Cited by 29,074
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
Cited by
Delta-Hedged Gains and the Negative Market Volatility Risk Premium
Bakshi, G., & Kapadia, N. (2003) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhg002 · Cited by 933
Christoffersen, P., Jacobs, K., & Mimouni, K. (2010) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhq032 · Cited by 312
Capturing Option Anomalies with a Variance-Dependent Pricing Kernel
Christoffersen, P., Heston, S., & Jacobs, K. (2013) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hht033 · Cited by 308
Self-citationOption valuation with conditional skewness
Christoffersen, P., Heston, S., & Jacobs, K. (2006) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.01.010 · Cited by 281
Self-citationDependence structure and extreme comovements in international equity and bond markets
Garcia, R., & Tsafack, G. (2011) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.01.003 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Heston, S. L., & Nandi, S.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 585-625
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W3123686478
- Cited by
- 971
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Closed-Form GARCH Option Valuation Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/13.3.585
- The paper
- Heston, S. L., & Nandi, S. (2000). A Closed-Form GARCH Option Valuation Model. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/13.3.585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.