Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are Insider Trades Informative?

Lakonishok, Josef, Lee, Inmoo·2001·Review of Financial Studies

Abstract

We examine insider trading activities of all companies traded on the NYSE, AMEX, and Nasdaq during the 1975–1995 period. In general, very little market movement is observed when insiders trade and when they report their trades to the SEC. Insiders in aggregate are contrarian investors. However, they predict market movements better than simple contrarian strategies. Insiders also seem to be able to predict cross-sectional stock returns. The result, however, is driven by insider’s ability to predict returns in smaller firms. In addition, informativeness of insiders’ activities is coming from purchases, while insider selling appears to have no predictive ability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rfs/14.1.79

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,227

Metadata

Authors
Lakonishok, J., & Lee, I.
Venue
Review of Financial Studies
Published
2001-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
79-111
ISSN
  • 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7368
OpenAlex
W3123062772
Cited by
1,227
References
2
FWCI
33.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Insider Trades Informative? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/14.1.79
The paper
Lakonishok, J., & Lee, I. (2001). Are Insider Trades Informative? Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.1.79

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.