The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tests of Financial Models in the Presence of Overlapping Observations
Abstract
A general approach to testing serial dependence restrictions implied from financial models is developed. In particular, we discuss joint serial dependence restrictions imposed by random walk, market microstructure, and rational expectations models recently examined in the literature. This approach incorporates more information from the data by explicitly modeling dependencies induced by the use of overlapping observations. Because the estimation problem is sufficiently simple in this framework, the test statistics have simple representations in terms of only a few unknown parameters. As a result, relatively good size properties are attained in small samples. In addition, the benefit to overlapping observations and the advantage of examining multiperiod time series are explicitly quantified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity
White, H. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912934 · Cited by 25,861
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913610 · Cited by 16,936
Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators
Hansen, L. P. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912775 · Cited by 13,467
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and AutocorrelationConsistent Covariance Matrix
Newey, W., & West, K. (1986) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/t0055 · Cited by 12,278
Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy
Lucas, R. E. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913837 · Cited by 5,014
Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test
Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/1.1.41 · Cited by 3,731
Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1988) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261535 · Cited by 3,025
A Test of the Efficiency of a Given Portfolio
Gibbons, M. R., Ross, S. A., & Shanken, J. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913625 · Cited by 2,350
Forward Exchange Rates as Optimal Predictors of Future Spot Rates: An Econometric Analysis
Hansen, L. P., & Hodrick, R. J. (1980) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260910 · Cited by 2,111
Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models
Hansen, L. P., & Singleton, K. J. (1984) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911486 · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns: Alternative Procedures for Inference and Measurement
Hodrick, R. J. (1992) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/5.3.351 · Cited by 1,523
The evolution of stock market efficiency over time: A survey of the empirical literature
Lim, K.-P., & Brooks, R. (2011) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00611.x · Cited by 410
Are Asian stock markets efficient? Evidence from new multiple variance ratio tests
Kim, J. H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2008) · Journal of Empirical Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2007.07.001 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, M., & Smith, T.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-254
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2086229640
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tests of Financial Models in the Presence of Overlapping Observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/4.2.227
- The paper
- Richardson, M., & Smith, T. (1991). Tests of Financial Models in the Presence of Overlapping Observations. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/4.2.227
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
