The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Explaining the Variance of Price–Dividend Ratios
Abstract
The author reports a bound on the variance of price-dividend ratios and a decomposition of their variance into terms that reflect changes in dividend growth and discount rates. The specification is not restrictive. The test statistics do not require construction of ex post present values; instead, they are restrictions on means, variances, and covariances of price-dividend ratios, dividend growth, and discount rates. He considers implications for the mean price-dividend ratio, and he evaluates whether a low mean discount rate can rationalize the mean and variance of price-dividend ratios. The results do not indicate any striking rejections of present-value models. However, the bulk of the variance of price-dividend ratios must be accounted for by changing forecasts of discount rates, and discount rates must possess some unusual characteristics. Article published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies in its journal, The Review of Financial Studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns: Alternative Procedures for Inference and Measurement
Hodrick, R. J. (1992) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/5.3.351 · Cited by 1,523
The Dog That Did Not Bark: A Defense of Return Predictability
Cochrane, J. H. (2008) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm046 · Cited by 1,227
Self-citationMarket expectations in the cross-section of present values
KELLY, B., & PRUITT, S. (2013) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12060 · Cited by 584
Fundamentals or Noise? Evidence from the Professional Basketball Betting Market
BROWN, W. O., & SAUER, R. D. (1993) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04751.x · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Cochrane, J. H.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-280
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2066364675
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.