Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,001

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A New Approach to Measuring Financial Contagion

Bae, Kee-Hong, Karolyi, G. Andrew, Stulz, Reneé M.·2003·Review of Financial Studies

Abstract

This article proposes a new approach to evaluate contagion in financial markets. Our measure of contagion captures the coincidence of extreme return shocks across countries within a region and across regions. We characterize the extent of contagion, its economic significance, and its determinants using a multinomial logistic regression model. Applying our approach to daily returns of emerging markets during the 1990s, we find that contagion is predictable and depends on regional interest rates, exchange rate changes, and conditional stock return volatility. Evidence that contagion is stronger for extreme negative returns than for extreme positive returns is mixed. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rfs/hhg012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Bae, K.-H., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M.
Venue
Review of Financial Studies
Published
2003-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
717-763
ISSN
  • 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7368
OpenAlex
W3121758033
Cited by
1,001
References
2
FWCI
35.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Approach to Measuring Financial Contagion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/hhg012
The paper
Bae, K.-H., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. M. (2003). A New Approach to Measuring Financial Contagion. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.