Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 875

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Often to Sample a Continuous-Time Process in the Presence of Market Microstructure Noise

Aït-Sahalia, Yacine, Mykland, Per A., Zhang, Lan·2005·Review of Financial Studies

Abstract

In theory, the sum of squares of log returns sampled at high frequency estimates their variance. When market microstructure noise is present but unaccounted for, however, we show that the optimal sampling frequency is finite and derives its closed-form expression. But even with optimal sampling, using say 5-min returns when transactions are recorded every second, a vast amount of data is discarded, in contradiction to basic statistical principles. We demonstrate that modeling the noise and using all the data is a better solution, even if one misspecifies the noise distribution. So the answer is: sample as often as possible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rfs/hhi016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 875

Metadata

Authors
Aït-Sahalia, Y., Mykland, P. A., & Zhang, L.
Venue
Review of Financial Studies
Published
2005
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
351-416
ISSN
  • 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7368
OpenAlex
W2113883339
Cited by
875
References
1
FWCI
98.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Often to Sample a Continuous-Time Process in the Presence of Market Microstructure Noise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/hhi016
The paper
Aït-Sahalia, Y., Mykland, P. A., & Zhang, L. (2005). How Often to Sample a Continuous-Time Process in the Presence of Market Microstructure Noise. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.