The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investor Attention and Stock Market Volatility
Open accessAbstract
We investigate in a theoretical framework the joint role played by investors’ attention to news and learning uncertainty in determining asset prices. The model provides two main predictions. First, stock return variance and risk premia increase with both attention and uncertainty. Second, this increasing relationship is quadratic. We empirically test these two predictions, and we show that the data lend support to the increasing relationship. The evidence for a quadratic relationship is mixed. Overall, our study shows theoretically and empirically that both attention and uncertainty are key determinants of asset prices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913610 · Cited by 16,936
Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators
Hansen, L. P. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912775 · Cited by 13,467
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and AutocorrelationConsistent Covariance Matrix
Newey, W., & West, K. (1986) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/t0055 · Cited by 12,278
On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks
GLOSTEN, L. R., JAGANNATHAN, R., & RUNKLE, D. E. (1993) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x · Cited by 9,008
Egeth, H., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421603 · Cited by 6,972
By Force of Habit: A Consumption‐Based Explanation of Aggregate Stock Market Behavior
Campbell, J. Y., & Cochrane, J. H. (1999) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250059 · Cited by 5,210
Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy
Lucas, R. E. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913837 · Cited by 5,014
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm079 · Cited by 4,556
Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. E. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913778 · Cited by 4,262
Risks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles
Bansal, R., & Yaron, A. (2004) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00670.x · Cited by 4,242
Cited by
RETRACTED: Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis
Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2018.09.003 · Cited by 1,172
RetractedAn inconvenient cost: The effects of climate change on municipal bonds
Painter, M. (2020) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.006 · Cited by 776
BEN‐DAVID, I., FRANZONI, F., & MOUSSAWI, R. (2018) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12727 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrei, D., & Hasler, M.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-09-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-72
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2103650532
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 32.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investor Attention and Stock Market Volatility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/hhu059
- The paper
- Andrei, D., & Hasler, M. (2015). Investor Attention and Stock Market Volatility. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.