CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilitySurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PATIENT INFORMATION RECALL IN A RHEUMATOLOGY CLINIC

ANDERSON, J. L., DODMAN, SALLY, KOPELMAN, M., FLEMING, A.·1979·Rheumatology
DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.18
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

One hundred and fifty-one patients representative of a routine rheumatology clinic were studied to assess the recall of information and the importance of factors influencing it. Total recall of given information was 40%. Recall regarding treatment was higher than that regarding diagnosis. Patients over the age of 70 years recalled less information. Those who were anxious recalled more than those who were relaxed. Patients misconstrued 48% of what they thought they remembered. The more information given, the lower was the proportion correctly recalled.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.18

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–168 of 168

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
ANDERSON, J. L., DODMAN, S., KOPELMAN, M., & FLEMING, A.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Prince of Wales Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
ANDERSON, J. L.
ORCID
Venue
Rheumatology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1979
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
18-22
ISSN
  • 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-0332
DOI
10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.18
OpenAlex
W1975079199
Cited by
167
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lara D. Veeken (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
patient education, rheumatology clinic, age effects, anxiety, information overload, patient understanding
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Communication, Humans, Memory, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Mental Recall, Rheumatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review