The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: A COMPARISON OF THE ROME, NEW YORK AND MODIFIED NEW YORK CRITERIA IN PATIENTS WITH A POSITIVE CLINICAL HISTORY SCREENING TEST FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
Open accessAbstract
The modified New York criteria for the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis were evaluated and compared to the older criteria in 151 patients, referred to hospital because of low back pain and who had a positive clinical history screening test for ankylosing spondylitis and in 31 controls with non-inflammatory back pain. Radiological examination of the sacro-iliac joints showed sacro-iliitis in 124 (82%) from the 151 with inflammatory back pain. In 110 (72%) of those patients a diagnosis of definite ankylosing spondylitis according to the classical New York criteria could be made and they had a prevalence of HLA-B27 of 84%. Application of the modified New York scheme increased the number of patients meeting the criteria for definite ankylosing spondylitis to all 124 patients with sacro-iliitis, and 82% of this group carried HLA-B27. The classical New York criteria of 'limitation of the lumbar spine in three directions' and of 'limitation of chest expansion' appeared to reflect disease duration rather than help in the initial diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Erbel (2014) · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 · Cited by 4,451
(2005) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.057 · Cited by 4,396
WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, Hiratzka, L. F., Bakris, G. L., Beckman, J. A., Bersin, R. M., Carr, V. F., Casey, D. E., Eagle, K. A., Hermann, L. K., Isselbacher, E. M., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3181d4739e · Cited by 2,289
Global prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis
Dean, L. E., Jones, G. T., MacDonald, A. G., Downham, C., Sturrock, R. D., & Macfarlane, G. J. (2014) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ket387 · Cited by 722
Mandl, P., Navarro-Compán, V, Terslev, L., Aegerter, P., van der Heijde, D., D'Agostino, M. A., Baraliakos, X., Pedersen, S. J., Jurik, A. G., Naredo, E., et al. (2015) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206971 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- GOEI THE, H. S., STEVEN, M. M., VAN DER LINDEN, S. M., & CATS, A.
- Venue
- Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242-249
- ISSN
- 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-0332
- OpenAlex
- W2160041723
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: A COMPARISON OF THE ROME, NEW YORK AND MODIFIED NEW YORK CRITERIA IN PATIENTS WITH A POSITIVE CLINICAL HISTORY SCREENING TEST FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/24.3.242
- The paper
- GOEI THE, H. S., STEVEN, M. M., VAN DER LINDEN, S. M., & CATS, A. (1985). EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: A COMPARISON OF THE ROME, NEW YORK AND MODIFIED NEW YORK CRITERIA IN PATIENTS WITH A POSITIVE CLINICAL HISTORY SCREENING TEST FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS. Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/24.3.242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
