The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterization to assess pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis
Open accessAbstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is an important complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Echocardiography can be used to detect PHT and, with Doppler echocardiography, the pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) can often be estimated. We have undertaken a study to compare echocardiographic assessment with right heart catheterization (RHC) in 33 SSc patients in whom clinical assessment [including ECG, chest X-ray, lung function tests and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) had raised strong suspicion of PHT. The mean (S.D.) interval between echocardiography and RHC was 1.8 (2.3) months. Twenty-one patients (64%) had PHT (PASP > or = 30 mmHg) on RHC, and echocardiography correctly identified 19 of these (sensitivity 90%). Of the 12 patients without PHT on RHC, nine were correctly identified by echocardiography (specificity 75%). The five incorrectly classified patients all had PASP in the borderline normal/abnormal range. The presence of tricuspid regurgitation allowed Doppler measurement of PASP in 20 patients (61%) and this correlated significantly with RHC values (r = 0.83, P < 0.001). We conclude that echocardiography is a reliable method for detecting PHT and it may be particularly useful for the early detection and monitoring of this potentially fatal complication in SSc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001 · Cited by 5,220
Cited by
Diagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension
Barst, R. J., McGoon, M., Torbicki, A., Sitbon, O., Krowka, M. J., Olschewski, H., & Gaine, S. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.02.032 · Cited by 992
Steen, V., & Medsger, T. A. (2003) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.10775 · Cited by 494
Janda, S., Shahidi, N., Gin, K., & Swiston, J. (2011) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2010.212084 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Denton, C. P., Cailes, J. B., Phillips, G. D., Wells, A. U., Black, C. M., & Bois, R. M.
- Venue
- Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-243
- ISSN
- 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-0332
- OpenAlex
- W2002114847
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterization to assess pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/36.2.239
- The paper
- Denton, C. P., Cailes, J. B., Phillips, G. D., Wells, A. U., Black, C. M., & Bois, R. M. (1997). Comparison of Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterization to assess pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/36.2.239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.