The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind trial, 999 subjects with active RA were randomized to leflunomide (n = 501; loading dose 100 mg/day for 3 days, maintenance dose 20 mg/day) or methotrexate (n = 498; 10-15 mg/week) for 52 weeks. After 1 yr the subjects could choose to stay for a second year of double-blind treatment. The primary end-points were tender and swollen joint counts and overall physician and patient assessments. Analyses were of the intent-to-treat group. RESULTS: After 1 yr, the mean changes in the leflunomide and methotrexate groups, respectively, were -8.3 and -9.7 for tender joint count; -6.8 and -9.0 for swollen joint count; -0.9 and -1.2 for physician global assessment; -0.9 and -1.2 for patient global assessment; -14.4 and -28.2 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Improvements seen with methotrexate were significantly greater than those with leflunomide. No further improvement occurred after the second year of treatment and the distinction between the two treatments in terms of tender joint count and patient global assessment was lost. During the first year of treatment, a small and equivalent degree of radiographically assessed disease progression was seen with both drugs. After 2 yr, disease progression was significantly less with methotrexate. The most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups were diarrhoea, nausea, alopecia, rash, headache, and elevated plasma liver enzyme levels. Over 2 yr, 21 subjects receiving methotrexate were withdrawn due to elevated plasma liver enzymes vs eight subjects taking leflunomide. Two drug-related deaths from pulmonary causes were recorded with methotrexate vs no drug-related deaths among the subjects receiving leflunomide. CONCLUSIONS: Both leflunomide and methotrexate are efficacious for prolonged treatment of RA. At the doses used, some clinical benefit of methotrexate over leflunomide was observed in the first year of treatment. This benefit must be weighed against the potential toxicity of this drug when used without folate supplementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smolen, J. S., Landewé, R., Bijlsma, J., Burmester, G., Chatzidionysiou, K., Dougados, M., Nam, J., Ramiro, S., Voshaar, M., van Vollenhoven, R., et al. (2017) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715 · Cited by 2,057
Self-citationTofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis
Lee, E. B., Fleischmann, R., Hall, S., Wilkinson, B., Bradley, J. D., Gruben, D., Koncz, T., Krishnaswami, S., Wallenstein, G. V., Zang, C., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1310476 · Cited by 711
Cohen, S., Hurd, E., Cush, J., Schiff, M., Weinblatt, M. E., Moreland, L. W., Kremer, J., Bear, M. B., Rich, W. J., & McCabe, D. (2002) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.10141 · Cited by 638
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Leflunomide
Rozman, B. (2002) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200241060-00003 · Cited by 250
The Definition and Measurement of Disease Modification in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
Aletaha, D., & Smolen, J. S. (2006) · Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2005.09.005 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Emery, P., Breedveld, F. C., Lemmel, E. M., Kaltwasser, J. P., Dawes, P. T., Gömör, B., Van den Bosch, F., Nordström, D., Bjørneboe, O., Dahl, R., Hørslev‐Petersen, K., Rodriguez de la Serna, A., Molloy, M., Tikly, M., Oed, C., Rosenburg, R., & Loew‐Friedrich, I.
- Venue
- Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 655-665
- ISSN
- 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-0332
- OpenAlex
- W2120574509
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.