The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk factors for new-onset low back pain amongst cohorts of newly employed workers
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that work-related mechanical, psychosocial and physical environment factors would predict new-onset low back pain (LBP) in newly employed workers. METHODS: A total of 1186 newly employed workers were recruited from a variety of occupational settings. Those who were free from LBP at baseline were identified. Subjects were followed up at 12 and 24 months. Work-related mechanical, psychosocial and physical environment exposures were measured. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess predictors of new-onset LBP. RESULTS: New-onset LBP was reported by 119 (19%) and 81 (19%) subjects at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Several work-related mechanical exposures predicted new-onset LBP including lifting heavy weights with one or two hands, lifting heavy weights at or above shoulder level, pulling heavy weights, kneeling or squatting for 15 min or longer. Of the psychosocial factors examined, stressful and monotonous work significantly predicted symptom onset. In addition, hot working conditions and pain at other sites also predicted new-onset LBP. On multivariate analysis these risks were only moderately attenuated but the 95% confidence intervals excluded unity only for the latter, non-mechanical, exposures. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of newly employed workers, from a range of occupations, several aspects of the work-place environment, other than mechanical factors, were important in predicting new-onset LBP. These results emphasize that interventions aimed at reducing the occurrence of LBP are likely to be most successful if they intervene across these domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
The economic burden of back pain in the UK
Maniadakis, N., & Gray, A. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00187-6 · Cited by 1,510
Symonds, T. L., Burton, A. K., Tillotson, K. M., & Main, C. J. (1995) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199512150-00016 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Scope, and Impact of Spinal Pain
Manchikanti, L. (2009) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2009/12/e35 · Cited by 721
Epidemiology of Low Back Pain in Adults
Manchikanti, L., Singh, V., Falco, F. J. E., Benyamin, R. M., & Hirsch, J. A. (2014) · Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1111/ner.12018 · Cited by 632
Risk factors for the onset of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
McLean, S. M., May, S., Klaber-Moffett, J., Sharp, D. M., & Gardiner, E. (2010) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2009.090720 · Cited by 222
“Individuals with a history of back pain and pain at other sites are at risk of developing neck pain. It is not clear why pain at other sites should lead to the onset of neck pain, and current research offers few insights into this particular relationship; however these findings are consistent with previous research.”
ResultSterud, T., & Tynes, T. (2013) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oemed-2012-101116 · Cited by 149
Schneider, S., Lipinski, S., & Schiltenwolf, M. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1015-2 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Harkness, E. F.
- Venue
- Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-03-14
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 959-968
- ISSN
- 0263-7103 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2172
- OpenAlex
- W2134507564
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for new-onset low back pain amongst cohorts of newly employed workers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/keg265
- The paper
- Harkness, E. F. (2003). Risk factors for new-onset low back pain amongst cohorts of newly employed workers. Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keg265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.