Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Update on the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for prescribing TNF blockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (update of previous guidelines of April 2001)

Ledingham, J., Deighton, C., on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group·2005·Rheumatology

Abstract

Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth and 1Southern Derbyshire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, UK. These guidelines have been developed for use by prescribing secondary-care rheumatologists. They are intended to indicate which adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may benefit from the anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies, precautions that need to be taken in their use and to highlight potential side-effects from these therapies. The previous guidelines applied to the then available anti-TNF therapies (etanercept and infliximab) [1]. These current guidelines would apply to these two products together with adalimumab, which is a newly licensed anti-TNF therapy for RA. This is a rapidly changing field with new data emerging each month, so that it is vital that clinicians keep up to date with this area of practice. These guidelines can only incorporate information that was available to the authors at the time of their completion. The guidelines have been drawn up by the above working party and have been approved by the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group (SGAWG). National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines, Medline literature searches for published data on the anti-TNF drugs and data from the pharmaceutical companies producing anti-TNF agents have been used to draw together the updated guidelines. The guidelines were subject to a consultation process at the BSR Annual Meeting 2004 and feedback was received from BSR members, allied health professionals, patient representatives and members of the pharmaceutical industry. The BSR SGAWG will be responsible for initiating a further update of these guidelines in the future and for auditing their use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rheumatology/keh464

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Metadata

Authors
Ledingham, J., Deighton, C., & on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology Standards, G. A. A. W. G.
Venue
Rheumatology
Published
2005-01-05
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
157-163
ISSN
  • 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-0332
OpenAlex
W2163624896
Cited by
331
References
72
FWCI
18.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Update on the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for prescribing TNF blockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (update of previous guidelines of April 2001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/keh464
The paper
Ledingham, J., Deighton, C., & on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology Standards, G. A. A. W. G. (2005). Update on the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for prescribing TNF blockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (update of previous guidelines of April 2001). Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh464

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.