Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and preliminary validation of a systemic lupus erythematosus-specific quality-of-life instrument (SLEQOL)

Leong, K. P., Kong, K. O., Thong, B. Y. H., Koh, E. T., Lian, T. Y., Teh, C. L., Cheng, Y. K., Chng, H. H., Badsha, H., Law, W. G., Lau, T. C., Chew, L. C., Ho, H. J., Pong, L. Y., Hoi, L. S., Sangeetha, N., Chan, S. P., Howe, H. S.·2005·Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a chronic illness with an unpredictable and variable course, profoundly affects the quality of life (QOL). General health questionnaires are used to assess QOL in SLE, but a disease-specific instrument could offer enhanced responsiveness and content validity. We detail the steps we took to develop and validate a new SLE-specific QOL instrument, SLEQOL. METHODS: Rheumatology professionals nominated items that they felt were important determinants of QOL of SLE patients. One hundred SLE patients were asked to assess the importance and frequency of occurrence of these items and to suggest those that had not been listed. Item reduction was performed using Rasch model and factor analyses to create a new questionnaire in English. This final questionnaire was administered to a cohort of 275 patients to study its psychometric properties. RESULTS: Fifty-one items covering a wide range of QOL concerns were identified. The patients' responses led to the elimination of 11. The new questionnaire of 40 items was found to have Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 and to consist of eight domains covering physical, mental and social QOL issues. It has good test-retest reliability, poor to fair cross-sectional correlation with the SF-36, with poor correlation with lupus activity or damage indices. The SLEQOL was more responsive to change than the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a new 40-item SLEQOL in English and showed that it is valid for use in SLE patients in Singapore. It offers better content validity and responsiveness to change than the SF-36.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rheumatology/keh605

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Leong, K. P., Kong, K. O., Thong, B. Y. H., Koh, E. T., Lian, T. Y., Teh, C. L., Cheng, Y. K., Chng, H. H., Badsha, H., Law, W. G., Lau, T. C., Chew, L. C., Ho, H. J., Pong, L. Y., Hoi, L. S., Sangeetha, N., Chan, S. P., & Howe, H. S.
Venue
Rheumatology
Published
2005-03-29
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
1267-1276
ISSN
  • 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-0332
OpenAlex
W2113367240
Cited by
204
References
3
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and preliminary validation of a systemic lupus erythematosus-specific quality-of-life instrument (SLEQOL). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/keh605
The paper
Leong, K. P., Kong, K. O., Thong, B. Y. H., Koh, E. T., Lian, T. Y., Teh, C. L., Cheng, Y. K., Chng, H. H., Badsha, H., Law, W. G., Lau, T. C., Chew, L. C., Ho, H. J., Pong, L. Y., Hoi, L. S., Sangeetha, N., Chan, S. P., & Howe, H. S. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of a systemic lupus erythematosus-specific quality-of-life instrument (SLEQOL). Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh605

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.