Cited by 131Radiation Therapy and DosimetryEffects of Radiation ExposureSpaceflight effects on biology

Implications of the space radiation environment for human exploration in deep space

Townsend, Lawrence W.·2005·Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Abstract

Human exploration of the solar system beyond Earth's orbit will entail many risks for the crew on these deep space missions. One of the most significant health risks is exposure to the harsh space radiation environment beyond the protection provided by the Earth's intrinsic magnetic field. Crew on exploration missions will be exposed to a complex mixture of very energetic particles. Chronic exposures to the ever-present background galactic cosmic ray (GCR) spectrum consisting of all naturally occurring chemical elements are combined with sporadic, possibly acute exposures to large fluxes of solar energetic particles, mainly protons and alpha particles. The background GCR environment is mainly a matter of concern for stochastic effects, such as the induction of cancer with subsequent mortality in many cases, and late deterministic effects, such as cataracts and possible damage to the central nervous system. Unfortunately, the actual risks of cancer induction and mortality owing to the very important high-energy heavy ion component of the GCR spectrum are essentially unknown. The sporadic occurrence of extremely large solar energetic particle events (SPE), usually associated with intense solar activity, is also a major concern for the possible manifestation of acute effects from the accompanying high doses of such radiations, especially acute radiation syndrome effects such as nausea, emesis, haemorrhaging or, possibly, even death. In this presentation, an overview of the space radiation environment, estimates of the associated body organ doses and equivalent doses and the potential biological effects on crew in deep space are presented. Possible methods of mitigating these radiations, thereby reducing the associated risks to crew are also described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rpd/nci141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 131

Authors
Townsend, L. W.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Townsend, Lawrence W.
Venue
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2005-12-20
Volume
115
Issue
1-4
Pages
44-50
ISSN
  • 0144-8420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-3406
OpenAlex
W2138849309
Cited by
131
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Protection Dosimetry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
space radiation environment, deep space exploration, galactic cosmic rays, solar energetic particle events, cancer induction, stochastic effects, deterministic effects, organ dose estimation, equivalent dose, radiation mitigation, radiation sickness
MeSH terms
Body Burden, Cosmic Radiation, Environmental Exposure, Extraterrestrial Environment, Humans, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Protection, Risk Factors, Space Flight, Occupational Exposure, Astronauts, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review