The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Canada’s Implementation of the UN Global Compacts on Migration and Refugees: Advancing Foreign Policy Objectives and the Status Quo?
Open accessAbstract
Canada has been a strong supporter of the 2018 United Nations Global Compacts (GCs) on Migration and Refugees. This article examines Canada’s reception and implementation of the GCs in the policy domains of refugee resettlement, complementary protection pathways, gender equality, and migration governance capacity building. It draws on the analytical framework of “migration diplomacy” to argue that Canada’s efforts to carry out the GC objectives in these areas are primarily motivated by foreign policy considerations, including those with significant domestic implications, rather than efforts to ensure domestic alignment with the GC principles enhancing migrants’ rights and freedoms. By supporting the GCs, Canada has positioned itself as a global leader in migration management. Migration diplomacy has also legitimised the implementation by Canada of exclusionary refugee policies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Refugee studies show that geopolitical and religio-cultural norms also shape the states' process of labelling and admitting refugees.”
From Wages of whiteness contra refugee in the twenty-first century: Afghan and Ukrainian women’s self-identification as (non)refugees in Canada (2026) · cites this paper as Atak, Linley-Moore, and Kim 2023
In the citing paper
“States accept or refuse certain populations under the label of refugee to ameliorate and maintain their own global political standing (Atak, Linley-Moore, and Kim 2023).”
From Wages of whiteness contra refugee in the twenty-first century: Afghan and Ukrainian women’s self-identification as (non)refugees in Canada (2026) · cites this paper as Atak, Linley-Moore, and Kim 2023
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Karimi, A. (2026) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2026.2693582 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Atak, I., Linley-Moore, C., & Kim, J. (. Y.
- Affiliations
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- Socio Legal Studies, York University PhD Candidate, , Toronto, Canada
- Immigration and Settlement Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University MA in , Canada
- Corresponding author
- Atak, Idil
- ORCID
- Atak, Idil
- Venue
- Refugee Survey Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-09-27
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-474
- ISSN
- 1020-4067 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-695X
- OpenAlex
- W4387120894
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Refugee Survey Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Research Council of Canada
- European Union’s Horizon 2020 (870761)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Immigration Law and Human Rights
- Keywords
- Canadian foreign policy, migration diplomacy, refugee resettlement, complementary protection, gender equality, migrant rights, refugee policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review