The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The "Other" Greek Crisis: Asylum and Eu Solidarity
Open accessAbstract
This article assesses the European Union’s efforts to implement refugee protection and how solidarity and responsibility-sharing apply between Member States. The analysis focuses on the case of Greece, which faces extreme migratory pressures and is still in the process of building an effective asylum system. The research locates the types of responsibilities owed to refugees under European Union law for selected areas such as humanitarian support upon arrival, assessment of protection needs, and provision of material reception conditions to those who request protection. It also examines the effect of the European Union’s responsibility allocation regime in placing those responsibilities disproportionately on Greece. As a response to this crisis, European Union’s institutions and agencies as well as individual Member States have undertaken a series of measures to support Greece. This research will outline European Union’s solidarity measures undertaken in Greece and their basis in European Union law. It will assess the impact of these mechanisms on Greece’s capacity to fulfil its humanitarian obligations and highlight gaps and challenges that remain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, given that most arrivals to Europe take place by foot (via Evros) or by sea, this legislation has placed obvious pressures on Greece and other member states at the EU's Mediterranean borders (see McDonough and Tsourdi 2012).”
From The social aesthetics of eligibility: NGO aid and indeterminacy in the Greek asylum process (2013) · cites this paper as McDonough and Tsourdi 2012
Citations
Cited by
The social aesthetics of eligibility: NGO aid and indeterminacy in the Greek asylum process
CABOT, H. (2013) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1111/amet.12032 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonough, P., & Tsourdi, E.
- Affiliations
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Tsourdi, E.
- ORCID
- Tsourdi, E.
- Venue
- Refugee Survey Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 67-100
- ISSN
- 1020-4067 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-695X
- OpenAlex
- W2162614700
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 30.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Refugee Survey Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- asylum policy, EU solidarity, shared responsibility, refugee protection, humanitarian obligations, EU asylum law, EU migration policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.