The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Antipsychotics: Classification, Efficacy, and Adverse Effects
Open accessAbstract
Compared to traditional neuroleptics, most of the new antipsychotics are characterized by a low extrapyramidal side effect (EPS) liability and varying antipsychotic efficacy. This topic is reviewed for four principal classes of new, established, and potential antipsychotics: (1) Antipsychotics such as sulpiride and remoxipride that block a subgroup of dopamine (DA) D2/D3 receptors produce a relatively low level of side effects, including EPS, and have an antipsychotic effect equal to or slightly weaker than traditional neuroleptics. D1 antagonists demonstrate a low level of EPS in primates and may prove to be a valuable new type of antipsychotic drug. (2) Theoretically, partial D2 agonists have the advantage of producing few or no EPS and a specific beneficial effect in negative symptoms, but as yet the expectations have not been fulfilled. (3) Nondopamine drugs such as serotonin (5HT1) agonists, 5HT2 antagonists, 5HT3 antagonists, and gamma-amino-butyric-acid-A (GABA-A) benzodiazepine agonists have anxiolytic, antidepressant, antiaggressive, and maybe antiparkinsonian effects and may play an adjunctive role in the treatment of schizophrenia. 5HT3 antagonists (e.g., ondansetron), partial benzodiazepine agonists, and partial glutamate agonists may prove to be effective antipsychotics. (4) Antipsychotics such as clozapine and risperidone, which affect D2/D3 receptors as well as 5HT, alpha 1, and/or D1 receptors appear to have the most pronounced antipsychotic effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mice with Reduced NMDA Receptor Expression Display Behaviors Related to Schizophrenia
Mohn, A. R., Gainetdinov, R. R., Caron, M. G., & Koller, B. H. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81972-8 · Cited by 1,075
Lawler, C. (1999) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(98)00099-2 · Cited by 408
The Inheritance of Neuropsychological Dysfunction in Twins Discordant for Schizophrenia
Cannon, T. D., Huttunen, M. O., Lonnqvist, J., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., Pirkola, T., Glahn, D., Finkelstein, J., Hietanen, M., Kaprio, J., & Koskenvuo, M. (2000) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/303006 · Cited by 375
Leysen, J. E., Janssen, P. M. F., Schotte, A., Luyten, W. H. M. L., & Megens, A. A. H. P. (1993) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02245006 · Cited by 334
Cannabidiol inhibits the hyperlocomotion induced by psychotomimetic drugs in mice
Moreira, F. A., & Guimarães, F. S. (2005) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.02.040 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerlach, J.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-309
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2137211291
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Antipsychotics: Classification, Efficacy, and Adverse Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/17.2.289
- The paper
- Gerlach, J. (1991). New Antipsychotics: Classification, Efficacy, and Adverse Effects. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/17.2.289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.