The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Medication Compliance in Schizophrenia: Empirical and Clinical Findings
Abstract
Advances in psychopharmacology have produced medications with substantial efficacy in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and the prevention of relapse or symptom exacerbation after an acute episode. In the clinical setting, the individual patient's acceptance or rejection of prescribed pharmacological regimens is often the single greatest determinant of these treatments' effectiveness. For this reason, an understanding of factors that impede and promote patient collaboration with prescribed acute and maintenance treatment should inform both pharmacological and psychosocial treatment planning. We review the substantive literature on medication adherence in schizophrenia and describe a modified health belief model within which empirical findings can be understood. In addition to factors intrinsic to schizophrenia psychopathology, medication-related factors, available social support, substance abuse comorbidity, and the quality of the therapeutic alliance each affect adherence and offer potential points of intervention to improve the likelihood of collaboration. Because noncompliance as a clinical problem is multidetermined, an individualized approach to assessment and treatment, which is often best developed in the context of an ongoing physician-patient relationship, is optimal. The differential diagnosis of noncompliance should lead to interventions that target specific causal factors thought to be operative in the individual patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Frank, A. F. (1990) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810150028006 · Cited by 552 · cited 1×
“Frank and Gunderson (1990) found that 74 percent of patients with fair or poor therapeutic alliances (rated at 6 months) failed to comply fully with prescribed medication regimens during the next year and a half.”
Background
Cited by
How stigma interferes with mental health care.
Corrigan, P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.7.614 · Cited by 3,648
The self–stigma of mental illness: implications for self–esteem and self–efficacy
Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C., & Barr, L. (2006) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875 · Cited by 1,406
Lacro, J. P., Dunn, L. B., Dolder, C. R., Leckband, S. G., & Jeste, D. V. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v63n1007 · Cited by 1,383
Mueser, K. T., & McGurk, S. R. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16458-1 · Cited by 876
Weiden, P. J., Kozma, C., Grogg, A., & Locklear, J. (2004) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.55.8.886 · Cited by 621
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenton, W. S., Blyler, C. R., & Heinssen, R. K.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 637-651
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W2143189599
- Cited by
- 957
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Medication Compliance in Schizophrenia: Empirical and Clinical Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/23.4.637
- The paper
- Fenton, W. S., Blyler, C. R., & Heinssen, R. K. (1997). Determinants of Medication Compliance in Schizophrenia: Empirical and Clinical Findings. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/23.4.637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.