The Impact of Anticholinergic Burden on Functional Capacity in Persons With Schizophrenia Across the Adult Life Span
Open accessAbstract
Anticholinergic burden (ACB) from medications impairs cognition in schizophrenia. Cognition is a predictor of functional capacity; however, little is known about ACB effect on functional capacity in this population. This study assesses the relationship between ACB and functional capacity across the life span in individuals with schizophrenia after controlling for ACB effect on cognition. A cross-sectional analysis was performed with data collected from 6 academic tertiary health centers. Two hundred and twenty-three community-dwelling participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included in this study. Main variables were ACB, antipsychotic olanzapine equivalents, functional capacity, cognition, and negative symptoms. Simultaneous linear regression analyses were performed to assess the association between ACB, functional capacity, and cognition and then between ACB and cognition. A mediation analysis was then performed to examine whether cognition mediated ACB effect on functional capacity if there was an association between ACB and cognition. Mean age of participants was 49.0 years (SD = 13.1, range 19–79), and 63.7% of participants had severe ACB, ie, a total score of 3 or above. Regression analyses revealed that ACB, age, education, and cognition independently predicted functional capacity and that ACB predicted cognition among those aged 55 years and older. Mediation analysis showed that cognition did partially mediate the effect of ACB on functional capacity in this older cohort. In conclusion, people with schizophrenia are exposed to severe ACB that can have a direct negative impact on functional capacity after controlling for its impact on cognition. Reducing ACB could improve functional capacity and potentially real-world function in schizophrenia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In that cross-sectional analysis, ACB scores were negatively associated with functional capacity and cognitive domains, such as attention/vigilance and speed of processing.
“and that ACB scores were negatively associated with functional capacity and cognitive domains, such as attention/vigilance and speed of processing85.”
From Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in schizophrenia: impact on cognitive and metabolic health (2021) · cites this paper as [85]
The Relationship Between ACB and Functional Capacity section reports a negative association in the full sample. The Relationship Between ACB and Cognition section reports negative associations with attention/vigilance and speed of processing only among participants aged 55 or older; the claim omits that restriction. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn a cross-sectional analysis of 233 community-dwelling participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder on APs, 63.7% of participants had severe ACB.
“In a cross-sectional analysis of 233 community-dwelling participants with SCZ or schizoaffective disorder on APs, it was found that 63.7% of participants had severe ACB, and that ACB scores were negatively associated with functional capacity and cognitive domains, such as attention/vigilance and speed of processing85.”
From Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in schizophrenia: impact on cognitive and metabolic health (2021) · cites this paper as [85]
The Abstract (page not supplied) describes a cross-sectional analysis of community-dwelling participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and reports that 63.7% had severe ACB. It gives the sample size as 223, not the claimed 233. (LLM, conf=0.95)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDespite their therapeutic benefits, the anticholinergic properties of APs may aggravate autonomic imbalance and exacerbate cognitive impairments in schizophrenia.
“These results indicate that, despite their therapeutic benefits, the anticholinergic properties of APs may aggravate autonomic imbalance and exacerbate cognitive impairments in SCZ.”
From Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in schizophrenia: impact on cognitive and metabolic health (2021) · cites this paper as [85]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says anticholinergic medications may adversely affect cognition in people with schizophrenia, supporting the cognitive-impairment part of the claim. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports no association between anticholinergic burden and cognition in the total sample. The paper does not support the claim about autonomic imbalance, and its cognitive discussion concerns medication burden rather than antipsychotics specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSubgroup analysis revealed that the effect of ACB on cognition and function was greatest among patients 55 years or older.
“Subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of ACB on cognition and function was greatest among patients 55 years or older.”
From Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in schizophrenia: impact on cognitive and metabolic health (2021) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 27
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [45]45. O'Reilly K, O'Connell P, Donohoe G, et al. Anticholinergic burden in schizophrenia and ability to benefit from psycho- social treatment programmes: a 3-year prospective cohort study. Psychol Med. 2016;46(15):3199-3211.
- Authors
- Khan, W. U., Ghazala, Z., Brooks, H. J., Subramaniam, P., Mulsant, B. H., Kumar, S., Voineskos, A. N., Blumberger, D. M., Kern, R. S., & Rajji, T. K.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rajji, Tarek K
- ORCID
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-07-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 249-257
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- PMC
- PMC7825090
- OpenAlex
- W3040331292
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institutes of Health (N01MH22006)
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR 200017, CIHR180087)
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- anticholinergic burden, functional capacity
- MeSH terms
- Functional Status, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Cholinergic Antagonists, Young Adult, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review