The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science to Practice: Making What We Know What We Actually Do
Open accessAbstract
The perspective of the medical director of a large public mental health agency is provided regarding how to close the gap between what we know and what we do in mental health care. Tools for change, actions required, and key actors are identified. The author believes the moment is propitious for improving care systemically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Similar findings have been reported across a number of clinical areas in different countries [4–6].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Lau, R., Stevenson, F., Ong, B. N., Dziedzic, K., Treweek, S., Eldridge, S., Everitt, H., Kennedy, A., Qureshi, N., Rogers, A., et al. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0396-4 · Cited by 533
“Clarity [4, 9, 18, 19, 26, 35, 42, 52, 59, 101] B: Uncertainty about when to initiate advanced care planning discussions—timing [101] F: Good clarity [35] √ √ √ √”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sederer, L. I.
- Affiliations
- New York State Office of Mental Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sederer, L. I.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-05-21
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 714-718
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- PMC
- PMC2696375
- OpenAlex
- W2118390208
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- evidence-based practice, research-practice gap
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Mental Health Services, Schizophrenia, Science, Comorbidity, Health Care Surveys, Evidence-Based Practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science to Practice: Making What We Know What We Actually Do. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/sbp040
- The paper
- Sederer, L. I. (2009). Science to Practice: Making What We Know What We Actually Do. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp040
