Cited by 212Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

What Are the Components of CBT for Psychosis? A Delphi Study

Open access
Morrison, A. P., Barratt, S.·2010·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

There is strong evidence supporting the implementation of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for people with psychosis. However, there are a variety of approaches to the delivery and conceptual underpinnings within different research groups, and the degree of consensus or disagreement regarding what are the intrinsic components has not been explored. This study uses the Delphi method to try to establish what a group of experts in CBT for psychosis view as important. Experts were invited to participate in 3 rounds of producing and rating statements that addressed areas such as principles, assessment, models, formulation, change strategies, homework, and therapists' assumptions in order to consolidate consensus of opinion. Seventy-seven items were endorsed as important or essential for CBT for psychosis by >80% of the panel. These recommendations should ensure greater fidelity in clinical practice, allow greater evaluation of adherence within clinical trials, facilitate the development of competency frameworks, and be of value in relation to training and dissemination of CBT for psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbp118

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 212

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Chadwick PD, Birchwood MJ, Trower P. Cognitive Therapy for Delusions, Voices and Paranoia. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  2. [15]National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Schizophrenia: core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in primary and secondary care. London, UK: Author, 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Authors
Morrison, A. P., & Barratt, S.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Morrison, A. P.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2009-10-30
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
136-142
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2159711454
Cited by
212
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
psychosis
MeSH terms
Delphi Technique, United Kingdom, Humans, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Evidence-Based Practice, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review