Cited by 478Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

NMDA Receptor Hypofunction, Parvalbumin-Positive Neurons, and Cortical Gamma Oscillations in Schizophrenia

Open access
Gonzalez-Burgos, G., Lewis, D. A.·2012·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Gamma oscillations appear to be dependent on inhibitory neurotransmission from parvalbumin (PV)-containing gamma-amino butyric acid neurons. Thus, the abnormalities in PV neurons found in schizophrenia may underlie the deficits of gamma-band synchrony in the illness. Because gamma-band synchrony is thought to be crucial for cognition, cognitive deficits in schizophrenia may reflect PV neuron dysfunction in cortical neural circuits. Interestingly, it has been suggested that PV alterations in schizophrenia are the consequence of a hypofunction of signaling through N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (NMDARs). Here, we review recent findings that address the question of how NMDAR hypofunction might produce deficits of PV neuron-mediated inhibition in schizophrenia. We conclude that while dysregulation of NMDARs may play an important role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, additional research is required to determine the particular cell type(s) that mediate dysfunctional NMDAR signaling in the illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbs010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In prefrontal cortex, NMDA-R impairments may lead to hypofunction of GABAergic PVBCs, disinhibition of pyramidal cells, and reduced prefrontal gamma activity.

    “In the prefrontal cortex, NMDA-R impairments may lead to hypofunction of GABAergic PVBC’s, disinhibition of pyramidal cells, and reduced prefrontal gamma activity (Gonzalez-Burgos and Lewis, 2012)”

    From The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis (2013) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Burgos and Lewis, 2012

    The section on NMDAR- and AMPA-mediated transmission reports pyramidal-cell disinhibition after NMDAR blockade in prefrontal cortex, but says it is unclear whether the affected GABA neurons are PVBCs. The section on gamma oscillations predicts that reducing NMDAR input to PVBCs would not reduce gamma power and reports evidence of increased gamma power instead. Thus, the paper argues against the claimed PVBC-to-reduced-gamma pathway. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The modification of the E/I balance within the PV-circuitry in PV-/- mice is reminiscent of the situation in schizophrenia, where NMDA receptor hypofunction leads to the reduction of GAD67 levels and thus GABA synthesis.

    “The modification of the E/I balance within the PV-circuitry in PV-/- mice is reminiscent of the situation in schizophrenia, where NMDA receptor hypofunction leads to the reduction of glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 (GAD67) levels and thus GABA synthesis.”
  • AMPA-mediated EPSPs in PV interneurons have short time constants and are ideally suited to support gamma-band oscillations.

    “AMPA-mediated EPSPs in PV interneurons have short time constants (fast kinetics) and are ideally suited to support gamma-band oscillations”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 478

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lesh TA, Niendam TA, Minzenberg MJ, Carter CS. Cogni- tive control deficits in schizophrenia: mechanisms and mean- ing. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:316-338.
  2. Fuchs EC, Zivkovic AR, Cunningham MO, et al. Recruit- ment of parvalbumin-positive interneurons determines hippo- campal function and associated behavio. Neuron. 2007;53: 591-604.

Authors
Gonzalez-Burgos, G., & Lewis, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2012-02-21
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
950-957
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2115624750
Cited by
478
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • SK Life Science
  • National Institutes of Health (MH043784, MH084053)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH084053, MH084053, R01MH043784, MH043784)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
schizophrenia, NMDA receptor hypofunction
MeSH terms
Animals, Awareness, Cerebral Cortex, Cholecystokinin, Cognition Disorders, Cortical Synchronization, Electroencephalography, Humans, Interneurons, Nerve Net, Neural Inhibition, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Parvalbumins, Schizophrenia, Signal Transduction, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Pyramidal Cells, Receptors, GABA, Receptors, AMPA, Glutamic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review