A randomized trial comparing in person and electronic interventions for improving adherence to oral medications in schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
Poor adherence to medication leads to symptom exacerbation and interferes with the recovery process for patients with schizophrenia. Following baseline assessment, 142 patients in medication maintenance at a community mental health center were randomized to one of 3 treatments for 9 months: (1) PharmCAT, supports including pill containers, signs, alarms, checklists and the organization of belongings established in weekly home visits from a PharmCAT therapist; (2) Med-eMonitor (MM), an electronic medication monitor that prompts use of medication, cues the taking of medication, warns patients when they are taking the wrong medication or taking it at the wrong time, record complaints, and, through modem hookup, alerts treatment staff of failures to take medication as prescribed; (3) Treatment as Usual (TAU). All patients received the Med-eMonitor device to record medication adherence. The device was programmed for intervention only in the MM group. Data on symptoms, global functioning, and contact with emergency services and police were obtained every 3 months. Repeated measures analyses of variance for mixed models indicated that adherence to medication was significantly better in both active conditions than in TAU (both p<0.0001). Adherence in active treatments ranged from 90-92% compared to 73% in TAU based on electronic monitoring. In-person and electronic interventions significantly improved adherence to medication, but that did not translate to improved clinical outcomes. Implications for treatment and health care costs are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Therapeutic adherence is described as a fluid process that reinforces collaborative approaches between the patient and the clinician and improves the relationship with professionals, affecting satisfaction with treatment.
“Some articles described therapeutic adherence as a fluid process that reinforces the collaborative approaches between the patient and the clinician [38,56,76] and improves the relationship with professionals [46], affecting satisfaction with treatment [34,45,62,77,78].”
From Therapeutic Adherence of People with Mental Disorders: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
Commitment to treatment is a behavioral strategy explicitly oriented toward mental illness management.
“Commitment to treatment is a behavioral strategy explicitly oriented toward mental illness management [36,38,45,48,62,77].”
From Therapeutic Adherence of People with Mental Disorders: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 87
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Sackett DL, Haynes RB. Compliance with therapeutic regi- mens. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1976.
- Hirsch SR, Barnes TRE. The clinical treatment of schizo- phrenia with antipsychotic medications. In: Hirsch SR, Weinberger DR, eds. Schizophrenia. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1995.
- Authors
- Velligan, D., Mintz, J., Maples, N., Xueying, L., Gajewski, S., Carr, H., & Sierra, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Velligan, D.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-10-19
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 999-1007
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- PMC
- PMC3756784
- OpenAlex
- W2144342782
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH074047)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- medication adherence, schizophrenia
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Administration, Oral, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Reminder Systems, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Medication Therapy Management, Medication Adherence, Maintenance Chemotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review