Symptom Dimensions of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales in Psychosis: A Multisite Study
Open accessAbstract
The Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS) is an instrument designed to quantify the severity of delusions and hallucinations and is typically used in research studies and clinical settings focusing on people with psychosis and schizophrenia. It is comprised of the auditory hallucinations (AHS) and delusions subscales (DS), but these subscales do not necessarily reflect the psychological constructs causing intercorrelation between clusters of scale items. Identification of these constructs is important in some clinical and research contexts because item clustering may be caused by underlying etiological processes of interest. Previous attempts to identify these constructs have produced conflicting results. In this study, we compiled PSYRATS data from 12 sites in 7 countries, comprising 711 participants for AHS and 520 for DS. We compared previously proposed and novel models of underlying constructs using structural equation modeling. For the AHS, a novel 4-dimensional model provided the best fit, with latent variables labeled Distress (negative content, distress, and control), Frequency (frequency, duration, and disruption), Attribution (location and origin of voices), and Loudness (loudness item only). For the DS, a 2-dimensional solution was confirmed, with latent variables labeled Distress (amount/intensity) and Frequency (preoccupation, conviction, and disruption). The within-AHS and within-DS dimension intercorrelations were higher than those between subscales, with the exception of the AHS and DS Distress dimensions, which produced a correlation that approached the range of the within-scale correlations. Recommendations are provided for integrating these underlying constructs into research and clinical applications of the PSYRATS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PSYRATS-AH items are grouped into four factors: distress, frequency, attribution, and loudness.
“Items are grouped together in four factors [36]; distress (negative content, distress and control), frequency (frequency, duration and disruption), attribution (location and origin of voices) and loudness (loudness item only).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 116
- Authors
- Woodward, T. S., Jung, K., Hwang, H., Yin, J., Taylor, L., Menon, M., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., Waters, F., Lecomte, T., Sommer, I. E., Daalman, K., van Lutterveld, R., Hubl, D., Kindler, J., Homan, P., Badcock, J. C., Chhabra, S., Cella, M., Keedy, S., Allen, P., Mechelli, A., Preti, A., Siddi, S., & Erickson, D.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- King's College London (GB)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of Chicago (US)
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Royal Columbian Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Woodward, Todd S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-06-13
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- Suppl_4
- Pages
- S265-S274
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- PMC
- PMC4141314
- OpenAlex
- W2119644549
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
- Michael Smith Health Research BC
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10103)
- King's College London
- Mitacs
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000430)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH092702)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- psychosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Delusions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review