To govern or be governed: an integrated framework for AI governance in the public sector
Abstract
There has been a significantly increased amount of literature on various aspects of artificial intelligence (AI), but research on AI governance has been a considerably underdeveloped area. This study proposes a comprehensive framework for designing AI governance in the public sector to overcome the limitations of previous studies that primarily dealt with the fragmentary aspect of AI. Also, we applied the developed framework to the case of Korea by combining it with the rank-order survey questions that target experts. This case study presents how to use the framework and provides insight for other countries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This choice also reflects the complexity of AI governance, where different aspects of oversight may require distinct types of regulatory approaches and expertise (Choi, 2023).
“However, this choice also reflects the complexity of AI governance, where different aspects of oversight may require distinct types of regulatory approaches and expertise (Choi, 2023).”
From Emerging models of national competent authorities under the EU AI Act (2025) · cites this paper as Choi, 2023
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 51 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Choi, H., & Park, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Software Policy and Research Institute (KR)
- Ajou University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Choi, Hyeri
- Park, Min Jae
- Venue
- Science and Public Policy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-08-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1059-1072
- ISSN
- 0302-3427 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5430
- OpenAlex
- W4385647556
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science and Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5A8065886)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- AI governance, artificial intelligence, public sector, governance framework, expert survey, Korea, government AI policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
