The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: a test of the Hall and Soskice claims
Abstract
In this paper, the varieties of capitalism (VoC) approach by Hall and Soskice (2001) is tested with longitudinal data and with measures covering all four institutional spheres differentiated in this approach. Among 26 OECD countries, we find various institutional configurations including a group of liberal market economies (LMEs) and of coordinated market economies (CMEs). However, these configurations are not stable. From 1990 to 2005, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden all moved from the CME model closer to the LME model. Capitalist variety is strongly linked to sector-specific comparative advantages, as predicted by Hall and Soskice—CMEs export more heavily in medium high-tech industries, and LMEs in high-tech industries. In addition, the economies that have moved towards the LME model have also specialized more strongly in high-tech over time. In sum, we find mixed evidence for the claims made by Hall and Soskice. Comparative advantages develop as predicted in the VoC approach, but the types of capitalism are more varied and more dynamic than the VoC approach suggests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Porter, M. E. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1 · Cited by 15,654
Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage 1
Balassa, B. (1965) · The Manchester School · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x · Cited by 4,809
Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond
Ragin, C. C. (2008) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001 · Cited by 4,445
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1023/a:1024471506938 · Cited by 3,432
An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism
(2001) · Varieties of Capitalism · doi:10.1093/0199247757.003.0001 · Cited by 3,083
The determinants of national innovative capacity
Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00152-4 · Cited by 2,332
The Diversity of Modern Capitalism
Amable, B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/019926113x.001.0001 · Cited by 1,930
National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool
Lundvall, B. (2007) · Industry & Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662710601130863 · Cited by 1,594
Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. (2009) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123409000672 · Cited by 1,113
Cited by
Dilli, S., Elert, N., & Herrmann, A. M. (2018) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-018-0002-z · Cited by 149
Hotho, J. J. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613502767 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneider, M. R., & Paunescu, M.
- Venue
- Socio-Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-02-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 731-753
- ISSN
- 1475-1461 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-147X
- OpenAlex
- W2329093592
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 134.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: a test of the Hall and Soskice claims. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ser/mwr038
- The paper
- Schneider, M. R., & Paunescu, M. (2012). Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: a test of the Hall and Soskice claims. Socio-Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
