The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Surplus Theory of Social Stratification and the Size Distribution of Personal Wealth
Abstract
The Surplus Theory of Social Stratification explains inequality of wealth in terms of(1) the fugitivity of wealth not needed to sustain the production of more wealth, (2) the tendency of wealth to flow into the hands of those who are already disproportionately wealthy, and (3) the ability of workers in an industrial society to retain a greater share of the wealth they produce than workers in societies with more primitive technologies. Size distributions of wealth from societies at different levels of technology can be fitted by a family of gamma distributions, whose shape parameter is related to a society's level of technology. The Surplus Theory implies a stochastic process that generates gamma-like distributions. Analysis of this process, the Inequality Process, explains many facts about size distributions of personal wealth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Continuous Univariate Distributions.
Omori, Y., Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291547 · Cited by 9,084
Economic Growth and Income Inequality
Kuznets, S. (2019) · The Gap between Rich and Poor · doi:10.4324/9780429311208-4 · Cited by 8,064
Sahlins, M., & Graeber, D. (2017) · Routledge (orig. 1972) · doi:10.4324/9781315184951 · Cited by 3,159
Galbraith, J. K. (2007) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400873180 · Cited by 2,595
(2014) · The IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology · doi:10.1351/goldbook.l03614 · Cited by 1,784
Pareto, V. (1964) · Librairie Droz eBooks · doi:10.3917/droz.paret.1964.01 · Cited by 1,772
Forecasting Economic Time Series
(2000) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00513 · Cited by 1,768
A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, by Amitai Etzioni
Fricke, P. (1976) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2148419 · Cited by 1,619
Mortuary Practices: Their Study and Their Potential
Binford, L. R. (1971) · Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology · doi:10.1017/s0081130000002525 · Cited by 768
Childe, V. G. (1939) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 693
Cited by
Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences
Kleiber, C., & Kotz, S. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471457175 · Cited by 1,117
Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income
Yakovenko, V. M., & Rosser, J. B. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1703 · Cited by 517
Wealth Inequality in the United States
Keister, L. A., & Moller, S. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.63 · Cited by 477
Watts, J., Greenhill, S. J., Atkinson, Q. D., Currie, T. E., Bulbulia, J., & Gray, R. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2556 · Cited by 352
Agent-based models of financial markets
Samanidou, E., Zschischang, E., Stauffer, D., & Lux, T. (2007) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/70/3/r03 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Angle, J.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1986-12-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-293
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116691920
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Surplus Theory of Social Stratification and the Size Distribution of Personal Wealth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/65.2.293
- The paper
- Angle, J. (1986). The Surplus Theory of Social Stratification and the Size Distribution of Personal Wealth. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/65.2.293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
