Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

On Narrative and Sociology

John Shelton Reed·1989·Social Forces

Abstract

The dismal state of scholarly writing, especially in the social sciences, reflects (1) lack of training in effective communication, (2) lack of sanctions for bad writing, and possibly (3) a rhetorical strategy intended to validate claims to expertise. Good writing can and should be taught; its absence should be remarked, if not penalized; and rhetoric should be recognized for what it is. If sociological work is to be appreciated outside the discipline, good writing is a necessary first step. In addition, however, sociologists should reconsider the case for descriptive, interpretive work. Most sociologists now value such work less highly than hypothetico-deduc- tive social science, but the application of sociological concepts and methods to the understanding of particular cases is a worthwhile undertaking, and one that the general public tends to find more interesting than the search for explanatory theory. There should be room in sociology, as in other disciplines, not just for different research styles, but for different goals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1093/sf/68.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Reed, J. S.
Venue
Social Forces
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
1989-09-01
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4255947639
Cited by
324
References
0
FWCI
16.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Narrative and Sociology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/68.1.1
The paper
Reed, J. S. (1989). On Narrative and Sociology. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/68.1.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.