The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: Effects on Marital Quality
Abstract
Under what circumstances will married women perceive inequalities in the division of household labor as unfair? This research develops and tests a model based on relative deprivation theory that suggests that gender ideology functions as a moderator variable in a process through which inequalities in the division of household labor come to be seen as inequities. Using data from the National Survey of Families and Households, three empirical tests of the model provide evidence that inequalities in the division of household labor are more strongly related to perceptions of inequity for egalitarian than for traditional wives, and that perceptions of inequity are more strongly related to perceived quality of the marital relationship for egalitarian than for traditional wives. The findings suggest that researchers studying the division of household labor need to shift their focus away from analyses of objective inequalities and toward the study of perceived inequity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Men and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,288
Gender in Families: Women and Men in Marriage, Work, and Parenthood
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353201 · Cited by 939
Relative Deprivation and Working Women, 1978-79
Crosby, F. J. (1982) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/rscfe2 · Cited by 801
The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households.
Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. L. (1988) · Cited by 698
I Will Follow Him: Family Ties, Gender-Role Beliefs, and Reluctance to Relocate for a Better Job
Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1992) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229901 · Cited by 521
Measuring the Division of Household Labor: Gender Segregation of Housework Among American Couples
BLAIR, S. L., & LICHTER, D. T. (1991) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/019251391012001007 · Cited by 481
Thompson, L. (1991) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/019251391012002003 · Cited by 447
Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353243 · Cited by 255
Mederer, H. J. (1993) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352964 · Cited by 243
Perry‐Jenkins, M., & Folk, K. F. (1994) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352711 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work
Coltrane, S. (2000) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x · Cited by 1,748
Playing All the Roles: Gender and the Work-Family Balancing Act
Milkie, M. A., & Peltola, P. (1999) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353763 · Cited by 469
Greenstein, T. N. (1996) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353719 · Cited by 428
Self-citationBrooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/s0049-089x(03)00041-3 · Cited by 406
The Family in Israel: Between Tradition and Modernity
Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2003) · Marriage & Family Review · doi:10.1300/j002v35n01_11 · Cited by 362
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenstein, T. N.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1029-1029
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161345470
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 25.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: Effects on Marital Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/74.3.1029
- The paper
- Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender Ideology and Perceptions of the Fairness of the Division of Household Labor: Effects on Marital Quality. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/74.3.1029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.