What Money Doesn't Buy: Class Resources and Children's Participation in Organized Extracurricular Activities
Abstract
Recent research suggests that participation in organized extracurricular activities by children and adolescents can have educational and occupational payoffs. This research also establishes that participation is strongly associated with social class. However, debate has ensued—primarily among qualitative researchers—over whether the association between class and activities stems exclusively from inequalities in objective resources and constraints or whether differing cultural orientations have a role. We address this debate using a nationally representative sample of children's time diaries, merged with extensive information on their families, to model participation in, and expenditures on, organized activities. While we cannot directly observe cultural orientations, we account for a substantially wider array of resources and constraints than previous studies. We find that, above and beyond these factors, maternal education has a consistently large effect on the outcomes we study. We discuss the plausibility of a cultural interpretation of this result, as well as alternative interpretations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unequal access to educational resources such as home learning, extracurricular activities and summer camps likely explains why out-of-school time contributes more to inequalities.
“likely due to unequal access to educational resources such as home learning, extracurricular activities (ECA) and summer camps (Coley et al., 2020;Weininger et al., 2015).”
From Participation in extracurricular activities predicts academic growth and mediates socioeconomic inequalities in primary school (2026) · cites this paper as Weininger et al., 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions
Easterbrook, M. J., & Hadden, I. R. (2021) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12070 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
The Labor Market Value of Taste: An Experimental Study of Class Bias in U.S. Employment
Thomas, K. (2018) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v5.a24 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Brunet, L., Rémeau, M., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.70127
- Authors
- Weininger, E. B., Lareau, A., & Conley, D.
- Affiliations
- SUNY Brockport (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weininger, Elliot B.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-05-28
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-503
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2173148682
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 32.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Forces (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- children's participation, social class, class inequality, cultural capital, cultural orientation, maternal education, time use, family resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review