Cited by 90Treatment of Major DepressionSleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Acute, Subchronic and Withdrawal Sleep EEG Changes During Treatment With Paroxetine and Amitriptyline: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial in Major Depression

Abstract

Paroxetine (30 mg), a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, was compared in a double-blind trial to amitriptyline (150 mg) in a sample of 40 inpatients aged 18-65 years who fulfilled Research Diagnostic Criteria for major depression. Patients were studied after a placebo drug washout period of 10 days and after an active 4-week treatment period. Sleep EEG recordings were performed before and at the end of the study as well as during acute treatment (first 2 days) and following withdrawal of active medication. Paroxetine shows an antidepressant effect similar to amitriptyline with a different side-effect profile typical of 5-HT reuptake inhibition. Paroxetine and amitriptyline decreased the amount of REM sleep, a well-known effect of classical antidepressants. Paroxetine also shared with other 5-HT reuptake inhibitors an alerting effect on sleep that was not shown to be detrimental on subjective sleep quality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/18.6.470

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amitriptyline (150mg) produced more alerting effects than paroxetine (30mg) in depressed patients.

    “(Staner et al., 1995) found that amitriptyline (150mg) produced more alerting effects than paroxetine (30mg).”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Staner et al., 1995

  • Paroxetine (30mg) was more alerting than amitriptyline (150mg).

    “(Staner et al., 1995) showed that paroxetine (30mg) was more alerting than amitriptyline (150mg).”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Staner et al., 1995

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Staner, L., Kerkhofs, M., Detroux, D., Leyman, S., Linkowski, P., & Mendlewicz, J.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) (BE)
Corresponding author
Luc Staner
Venue
Sleep
Published
1995-08-01
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
470-7
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W204785327
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
paroxetine, amitriptyline, major depressive disorder, sleep EEG, REM sleep, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, antidepressant discontinuation, sleep quality, antidepressant side effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Amitriptyline, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review