Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methods for Obtaining and Analyzing Unattended Polysomnography Data for a Multicenter Study

Open access
Sleep Heart Health Research Group, Redline, Susan, Sanders, Mark H., Lind, Bonnie K., Quan, Stuart F., Iber, Conrad, Gottlieb, Daniel J., Bonekat, William H., Rapoport, David M., Smith, Philip L., Kiley, James P.·1998·Sleep

Abstract

THE SLEEP HEART HEALTH STUDY (SHHS) is the first large-scale multicenter study of sleep-disordered breathing.The objectives and general study design have been described in detail previously. 1 Briefly, the SHHS is a prospective cohort study designed to investigate the relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease.Participants were recruited from eight existing epidemiological studies in which data on cardiovascular risk factors had been collected previously.Although the infrastructure for obtaining cardiovascular risk factor data and for ascertaining morbid and mortal events was available through the parent cohorts, the SHHS developed pro- SLEEP, Vol.21, No. 7, 1998 Summary: This paper reviews the data collection, processing, and analysis approaches developed to obtain comprehensive unattended polysomnographic data for the Sleep Heart Health Study, a multicenter study of the cardiovascular consequences of sleep-disordered breathing.Protocols were developed and implemented to standardize in-home data collection procedures and to perform centralized sleep scoring.Of 7027 studies performed on 6697 participants, 5534 studies were determined to be technically acceptable (failure rate 5.3%).Quality grades varied over time, reflecting the influences of variable technician experience, and equipment aging and modifications.Eighty-seven percent of studies were judged to be of good quality or better, and 75% were judged to be of sufficient quality to provide reliable sleep staging and arousal data.Poor submental EMG (electromyogram) accounted for the largest proportion of poor signal grades (9% of studies had <2 hours artifact free EMG signal).These data suggest that with rigorous training and clear protocols for data collection and processing, good-quality multichannel polysomnography data can be obtained for a majority of unattended studies performed in a research setting.Data most susceptible to poor signal quality are sleep staging and arousal data that require clear EEG (electroencephalograph) and EMG signals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/21.7.759

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Sleep Heart Health Research Group, Redline, S., Sanders, M. H., Lind, B. K., Quan, S. F., Iber, C., Gottlieb, D. J., Bonekat, W. H., Rapoport, D. M., Smith, P. L., & Kiley, J. P.
Venue
Sleep
Published
1998-10-01
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
759-767
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W194485135
Cited by
531
References
1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for Obtaining and Analyzing Unattended Polysomnography Data for a Multicenter Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sleep/21.7.759
The paper
Sleep Heart Health Research Group, Redline, S., Sanders, M. H., Lind, B. K., Quan, S. F., Iber, C., Gottlieb, D. J., Bonekat, W. H., Rapoport, D. M., Smith, P. L., & Kiley, J. P. (1998). Methods for Obtaining and Analyzing Unattended Polysomnography Data for a Multicenter Study. Sleep. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/21.7.759

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.