Cited by 60Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Upper Airway Resistance Syndrome: Effect of Nasal Dilation, Sleep Stage, and Sleep Position

Ahmed Salem BaHammam, ROBERT BRIAN TATE, Jure Manfreda, Meir H. Kryger, MD, FRCPC·1999·Sleep

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The upper airway resistance syndrome (UARS) is one of the mild variants of obstructive sleep disordered breathing. Nasal obstruction is proposed as one of the mechanisms that lowers intrapharyngeal pressure and hence increases airway collapsibility. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of external nasal dilation and sleep position on sleep in UARS. METHOD: A double blind, randomized, controlled study with a crossover design (using therapeutic and placebo dilators) was conducted in 18 consecutive patients with UARS. Each patient had two overnight sleep studies one to two weeks apart. Cardiorespiratory parameters (AHI, percentage of time that SaO2 was more than 2% below awake [desaturation time] and mean overnight heart rate), sleep architecture (sleep stages, sleep efficiency, and arousal index), and body position were determined. RESULTS: Application of the external nasal dilator resulted in a significant increase in the nasal cross-sectional area (p < 0.001). Treatment reduced stage 1 sleep (as a percent of total sleep time) from 8.6 +/- 0.8% to 7.1 +/- 0.7 (SEM), p = 0.034). Desaturation time was significantly lower with treatment (12.2 +/- 2.2% on placebo versus 9.1 +/- 1.3 on treatment, p = 0.04). There were no additional significant effects on the cardiorespiratory parameters, sleep architecture, or MSLT when the entire night was examined. Controlling for interactions of sleep stage and position and treatment we found that treatment reduced desaturation time (p = 0.03) but not AHI or arousal index. AHI was significantly lower in the lateral position compared to the supine (p = 0.0001) and in NREM sleep compared to REM (p = 0.001). Desaturation time was significantly lower on the lateral compared to the supine position (p = 0.002) and in NREM sleep compared to REM (p = 0.006). Arousal index was highly dependent on sleep stage (p = 0.0001): the index was higher in stage 2 compared to slow wave sleep and REM. Sleep position and treatment had no significant effect on arousals. CONCLUSIONS: External nasal dilation reduced stage 1 sleep, an indirect marker of disrupted sleep, and desaturation time. There were no additional effects on sleep architecture or sleep disordered breathing. Both sleep position and sleep stage had a significant effect on sleep disordered breathing in UARS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/22.5.592

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study with 18 patients with upper airway resistance syndrome, there was no additional effect on sleep disordered breathing.

    “and in a study with 18 patients with upper airway resistance syndrome there was no additional effect on sleep disordered breathing 151.”

    From Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea (2011) · cites this paper as [151]

    The Abstract describes a study of 18 patients with upper airway resistance syndrome and reports no additional significant effects on several measured outcomes. But it also reports a significant reduction in desaturation time with nasal dilation, so the unqualified statement that there was no additional effect on sleep-disordered breathing overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Lugaresi E, Cirignotta F, Montagna P, Sforza E. Snoring: pathogenic, clinical, and therapeutic aspects. In Kryger M, Roth T, Dement WC. Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine, 2nd Edition, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:621-629.
  2. Guilleminault C, Stoohs R, Duncan S. Snoring (I): daytime sleepi- ness in regular heavy snorers. Chest 1991;99:40-48.
  3. Guilleminiault C, Stoohs R, Clerk A, Cetel M, Maistros P. A cause of excessive daytime sleepiness: the upper airway resistance syndrome. Sleep 1993;104:781-787.
  4. Kerr P, Millar T, Buckle P, Kryger M. The importance of nasal resistance in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Otolaryngol 1992; 21: 189-95.
  5. Lavie P, Fischel N, Zomer J, et al. Effects of partial and complete mechanical occlusion of the nasal passages on sleep structure and breathing in sleep. Acta Otolaryngol 1983;95:161-66.
  6. Lavie P, Gertner R, Zomer J, et al. Breathing disorders in sleep associated with microarousals in patients with allergic rhinintis. Acta Otolaryngol 1981;92:529-33.
  7. Hudgel DW, Robertson DW. Nasal resistance during wakefulness and sleep in normal men. Acta Otolaryngol 1984;98:130-35.
  8. Zwillich C, Pickett C, Hanson F, et al. Disturbed sleep and pro- longed apnea during nasal obstruction in normal men. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981;124:158-60.
  9. Olsen KD, Kern E. Nasal influences on snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Mayo Clin Proc 1990;65:1095-1105.
  10. Hoijer U, Ejnell H, Hender J, et al. The effects of nasal dilatation on snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:281-84.
  11. Petruson B. Increased nasal breathing decreases snoring and improves oxygen saturation during sleep apnea. Rhinology 1994;32:87- 89.
  12. Hoffstein V. Snoring. Chest 1996;109:201-22.
  13. West P, Kryger MH. Continuous monitoring of respiratory vari- ables during sleep by microcomputer. Methods Inf Med 1983;22:198- 203.
  14. Carskadon MA, Dement WC, Mitler MM, et al. Guidelines for Multiple Sleep Latency (MLST): A Standard Measure of Sleepiness. Sleep 1986;9:519-24.
  15. American Sleep Disorders Association, Atlas task Force. EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples. Sleep 1992;15:174-184.
  16. George CF, Millar TW, Kryger MH. Identification and quantifica- tion of apneas by computer based analysis of SaO2. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:1238-1240.
  17. Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Elbrond O, et al. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of the nasal cavity with septal deviations, before and after septoplasty. Laryngoscope 1989;99:1180-87.
  18. Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, et al. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 1995;105:275-81.
  19. Winer BJ. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1971.
  20. Scharf M, Brannen D, McDannold M, A subjective evaluation of a nasal dilator on sleep and snoring. Ear Nose Throat J 1994;73:395-401.
  21. Hoffstein V, Mateika S, Metes A. Effect of nasal dilation on snor- ing and apneas during different stages of sleep. Sleep 1993;16:360-365.
  22. Carskadon MA, Dement WC. Normal human sleep: an overview. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC (eds.)Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1994, p. 16-25.
  23. Series F, Marc I, Cormier Y, La Forge J. Utility of nocturnal home oximetry for case finding in patients with suspected sleep apnea hypop- nea syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1993;119(6):449-453.
  24. Cartwright R. Effect of sleep position on sleep apnea severity. Sleep 1984;7:110-114.
  25. George CF, Millar TW, Kryger MH. Sleep apnea and body position during sleep. Sleep 1988;11:90-99.
  26. Issa FG, Sullivan CE. Upper airway closing pressure in obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol 1984;57:520-527.
  27. Phillip P, Stoohs R, Guilleminault C. Sleep fragmentation in nor- mals: a model for sleepiness associated with upper airway resistance syndrome. Sleep 1994;17:242-247.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BaHammam, A. S., TATE, R. B., Manfreda, J., & Meir H. Kryger, M.
Affiliations
St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Meir H. Kryger, MD, FRCPC
Venue
Sleep
Published
1999-08-01
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
592-8
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W20221158
Cited by
60
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
upper airway resistance syndrome, nasal dilator, nasal obstruction, sleep position, sleep stages, sleep desaturation, obstructive sleep apnea, sleep architecture, arousal index, airway collapsibility, nasal cross-sectional area, REM sleep, NREM sleep, heart rate variability, sleep efficiency, multiple sleep latency test, cardiorespiratory parameters, apnea-hypopnea index
MeSH terms
Airway Resistance, Arousal, Dilatation, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Oxygen, Posture, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Stages, Snoring, Sound Spectrography, Nasal Obstruction, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review