Cited by 158Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Eight Weeks of Non-Nightly Use of Zolpidem for Primary Insomnia

Walsh, James K., Roth, Thomas, Randazzo, Angela, Erman, Milton, Jamieson, Andrew, Scharf, Martin, Schweitzer, Paula K., Ware, J. Catesby·2000·Sleep

Abstract

Context Intermittent use (i.e., a few nights per week) of hypnotic medication is often recommended for the treatment of chronic insomnia despite an absence of efficacy and safety data using this regimen. Study objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intermittent pharmacotherapy for chronic insomnia. Design and setting Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel groups, clinical trial at six sleep research sites. Patients One hundred-sixty-three (115 women, 48 men; mean age 44.1+ SE. 0.9 years), DSM-IV-defined primary insomnia patients were randomized, 134 patients completed the study. Interventions Eight weeks of treatment with either zolpidem 10 mg or placebo. Patients were instructed to take medication when they felt they needed it, but at least three and no more than five times per week. Main outcome measures Investigator and Patient Global Ratings were the primary outcome variables. Secondary measures from daily questionnaires to assess efficacy, rebound insomnia and drug taking behavior. Results The Investigator's Global Rating indicated that intermittent use of zolpidem produced a significantly better therapeutic effect and significantly reduced insomnia severity throughout the 8-week study relative to placebo. Zolpidem was found to be effective in initiating and maintaining sleep on nights taken, as compared to placebo, based upon the Patient's Global Ratings and all subjective sleep variables. No evidence of rebound insomnia was found on…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/23.8.1h

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, J. K., Roth, T., Randazzo, A., Erman, M., Jamieson, A., Scharf, M., Schweitzer, P. K., & Ware, J. C.
Affiliations
  • St. Luke's Hospital (US)
  • Henry Ford Hospital (US)
  • Pacific Sleep Medicine, La Jolla
  • Sleep Medicine Associates, Dallas
  • Center for Research in Sleep Disorders, Cincinnati
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Walsh, James K.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W77194413
Cited by
158
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
zolpidem, primary insomnia, chronic insomnia, hypnotics, rebound insomnia, drug use behavior, insomnia severity, quality of life, neurocognitive effects
MeSH terms
Zolpidem, Analysis of Variance, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Pyridines, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review