The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Practice Parameters for the Use of Portable Monitoring Devices in the Investigation of Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A variety of devices are used to evaluate patients with a potential diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A committee comprised of members of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American Thoracic Society, and American College of Chest Physicians systematically evaluated data on the use of these devices and developed practice parameters. DEVICES REVIEWED: Three categories of portable monitoring (PM) devices were reviewed with regard to assessing the probability of identifying an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of greater or less than 15 in attended and unattended settings. Type 2 (minimum of seven channels, including EEG, EOG, chin EMG, ECG or heart rate, airflow, respiratory effort, oxygen saturation), Type 3 (minimum of four channels, including ventilation or airflow (at least two channels of respiratory movement, or respiratory movement and airflow), heart rate or ECG and oxygen saturation) and Type 4 (most monitors of this type measure a single parameter or two parameters) devices were evaluated, and in-laboratory, attended polysomnography was used as a reference. SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) Insufficient evidence is available to recommend the use of Type 2 PM devices in attended or unattended settings. (2) Type 3 PM devices appear to be capable of being used in an attended setting to increase or to decrease the probability that a patient has an apnea-hypopnea index greater than 15. (3) The use of Type 3 PM devices in an unattended setting is not recommended to rule in, rule out, or both rule in and rule out a diagnosis of OSA. (4) There is some evidence that the use of Type 3 PM devices in an attended in-laboratory setting may be acceptable to both rule in and rule out a diagnosis of OSA if certain limitations are in place. These limitations include manually scoring the records, using the devices only in patients without significant comorbid conditions, having an awareness that symptomatic patients with a negative study should have a Type 1 study, and not using these devices for titrating positive airway pressure or conducting split-night studies. (5) The use of Type 4 PM devices in attended or unattended settings is not recommended. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Type 3 and 4 PM devices cannot score sleep and, therefore, do not meet some current Medicare guidelines. The use of PM devices is not recommended for general-population screening or in the absence of a pretest probability of the patient having a diagnosis of OSA, for complaints other than those associated with OSA, without review of raw data during interpretation, by physicians without familiarity with their use and limitations, and without trained personnel to perform technical scoring. Future research should address the use of PM devices in patients with comorbid conditions; non-White patients and women; larger, better-controlled studies; studies focused on the use of Type 2 and 3 devices; studies focusing on decision making and outcomes rather than simple classification using arbitrary cutoffs; and studies that seek to elucidate cost-effectiveness data on the use of PM devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kushida, C. A., Littner, M. R., Morgenthaler, T., Alessi, C. A., Bailey, D., Coleman, J., Friedman, L., Hirshkowitz, M., Kapen, S., Kramer, M., et al. (2005) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/28.4.499 · Cited by 2,054
Collop, N. A., Anderson, W. M., Boehlecke, B., Claman, D., Goldberg, R., Gottlieb, D. J., Hudgel, D., Sateia, M., Schwab, R., & Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2007) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.5664/jcsm.27032 · Cited by 1,550
ZUCCONI, M., FERRI, R., ALLEN, R., BAIER, P., BRUNI, O., CHOKROVERTY, S., FERINISTRAMBI, L., FULDA, S., GARCIABORREGUERO, D., & HENING, W. (2006) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2006.01.001 · Cited by 455
Practice Parameters for the Medical Therapy of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Standards of Practice Committee of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Morgenthaler, T. I., Kapen, S., Lee-Chiong, T., Alessi, C., Boehlecke, B., Brown, T., Coleman, J., Friedman, L., Kapur, V., et al. (2006) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/29.8.1031 · Cited by 299
European position paper on drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE)
De Vito, A., Carrasco Llatas, M., Vanni, A., Bosi, M., Braghiroli, A., Campanini, A., de Vries, N., Hamans, E., Hohenhorst, W., Kotecha, B. T., et al. (2014) · Sleep and Breathing · doi:10.1007/s11325-014-0989-6 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Chesson, A. L., Berry, R. B., & Pack, A.
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 907-913
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- OpenAlex
- W2138481777
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practice Parameters for the Use of Portable Monitoring Devices in the Investigation of Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sleep/26.7.907
- The paper
- Chesson, A. L., Berry, R. B., & Pack, A. (2003). Practice Parameters for the Use of Portable Monitoring Devices in the Investigation of Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults. Sleep. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/26.7.907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.