Cited by 1,142Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Practice Parameters for Clinical Use of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test

Littner, Michael R., Kushida, Clete, Wise, Merrill, G. Davila, David, Morgenthaler, Timothy, Lee-Chiong, Teofilo, Hirshkowitz, Max, Loube, Daniel L. +4 more·2005·Sleep

Abstract

Characterization of excessive sleepiness is an important task for the sleep clinician, and assessment requires a thorough history and in many cases, objective assessment in the sleep laboratory. These practice parameters were developed to guide the sleep clinician on appropriate clinical use of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). These recommendations replace those published in 1992 in a position paper produced by the American Sleep Disorders Association. A Task Force of content experts was appointed by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine to perform a comprehensive review of the scientific literature and grade the evidence regarding the clinical use of the MSLT and the MWT. Practice parameters were developed based on this review and in most cases evidence based methods were used to support recommendations. When data were insufficient or inconclusive, the collective opinion of experts was used to support recommendations. These recommendations were developed by the Standards of Practice Committee and reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The MSLT is indicated as part of the evaluation of patients with suspected narcolepsy and may be useful in the evaluation of patients with suspected idiopathic hypersomnia. The MSLT is not routinely indicated in the initial evaluation and diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, or in assessment of change following treatment with nas…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/28.1.113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological and behavioral interventions are effective in treating chronic primary and comorbid insomnia.

    “Psychological and behavioral interventions are effective and recommended in the treatment of chronic primary and comorbid (secondary) insomnia. (Standard)”
  • Physical and mental status examination may provide important information regarding comorbid conditions and differential diagnosis.

    “Physical and mental status examination may provide important information regarding comorbid conditions and differential diagnosis. (Standard)”
  • Multicomponent therapy without cognitive therapy is effective in treating chronic insomnia.

    “Multicomponent therapy (without cognitive therapy) is effective and recommended therapy in the treatment of chronic insomnia. (Guideline)”
  • Psychological and behavioral treatments are effective for adults of all ages, including older adults, and chronic hypnotic users.

    “These treatments are effective for adults of all ages, including older adults, and chronic hypnotic users. (Standard)”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 16 · Cited by 1,142

Authors
Littner, M. R., Kushida, C., Wise, M., G. Davila, D., Morgenthaler, T., Lee-Chiong, T., Hirshkowitz, M., Loube, D. L., Bailey, D., Berry, R. B., Kapen, S., & Kramer, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • National Jewish Health (US)
  • Swedish Medical Center (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Maimonides Medical Center (US)
Venue
Sleep
Published
2005-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
113-121
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W183461293
Cited by
1,142
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 59
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
multiple sleep latency test, maintenance of wakefulness test, excessive sleepiness, narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP treatment response, crash risk, reference values, test protocol
MeSH terms
Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Narcolepsy, Psychophysiology, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review