The Effects of Caffeine, Dextroamphetamine, and Modafinil on Humor Appreciation During Sleep Deprivation
Abstract
Study objectives Sleep loss consistently impairs performance on measures of alertness, vigilance, and response speed, but its effects on higher-order executive functions are not well delineated. Similarly, whereas deficits in arousal and vigilance can be temporarily countered by the use of several different stimulant medications, it is not clear how these compounds affect complex cognitive processes in sleep-deprived individuals. Design We evaluated the effects of double-blind administration of 3 stimulant medications or placebo on the ability to appreciate humor in visual (cartoons) or verbal (headlines) stimuli presented on a computer screen following 49.5 hours of sleep deprivation. Setting In-residence sleep-laboratory facility at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Participants Fifty-four healthy adults (29 men, 24 women), ranging in age from 18 to 36 years. Interventions Each participant was randomly assigned to 1 of 3 stimulant medication groups, including caffeine, 600 mg, n = 12; modafinil, 400 mg, n = 11; dextroamphetamine, 20 mg, n = 16; or placebo, n = 14. Measurements and results Humor appreciation for cartoon stimuli was enhanced by modafinil relative to both placebo and caffeine, but there was no effect of any stimulant medication on the appreciation of verbal humor during sleep loss. In contrast, all 3 stimulants improved psychomotor response speed, whereas only caffeine and dextroamphetamine improved ratings of subjective sleepiness. Conclusions Findi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Amphetamine restored executive functions and psychomotor vigilance test speed following continuous sleep deprivation.
“AMP restored executive functions (Killgore et al., 2009) and psychomotor vigilance test speed following continuous sleep deprivation (Killgore et al., 2006, 2008; Wesensten et al., 2005).”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Killgore et al., 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Killgore, W. D. S., McBride, S. A., Killgore, D. B., & Balkin, T. J.
- Affiliations
- Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Killgore, William D.S.
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 841-847
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- OpenAlex
- W2126773707
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SLEEP (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Keywords
- sleep deprivation, humor appreciation, caffeine, d-amphetamine, modafinil, stimulant medication, executive function, prefrontal cortex, subjective sleepiness, cartoons, verbal humor
- MeSH terms
- Modafinil, Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Benzhydryl Compounds, Caffeine, Cognition, Dextroamphetamine, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Male, Psychological Tests, Psychomotor Agitation, Sleep Deprivation, Wit and Humor as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review