Cited by 71Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchCoffee research and impacts

The Effects of Caffeine, Dextroamphetamine, and Modafinil on Humor Appreciation During Sleep Deprivation

Killgore, William D.S., McBride, Sharon A., Killgore, Desiree B., Balkin, Thomas J.·2006·Sleep

Abstract

Study objectives Sleep loss consistently impairs performance on measures of alertness, vigilance, and response speed, but its effects on higher-order executive functions are not well delineated. Similarly, whereas deficits in arousal and vigilance can be temporarily countered by the use of several different stimulant medications, it is not clear how these compounds affect complex cognitive processes in sleep-deprived individuals. Design We evaluated the effects of double-blind administration of 3 stimulant medications or placebo on the ability to appreciate humor in visual (cartoons) or verbal (headlines) stimuli presented on a computer screen following 49.5 hours of sleep deprivation. Setting In-residence sleep-laboratory facility at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Participants Fifty-four healthy adults (29 men, 24 women), ranging in age from 18 to 36 years. Interventions Each participant was randomly assigned to 1 of 3 stimulant medication groups, including caffeine, 600 mg, n = 12; modafinil, 400 mg, n = 11; dextroamphetamine, 20 mg, n = 16; or placebo, n = 14. Measurements and results Humor appreciation for cartoon stimuli was enhanced by modafinil relative to both placebo and caffeine, but there was no effect of any stimulant medication on the appreciation of verbal humor during sleep loss. In contrast, all 3 stimulants improved psychomotor response speed, whereas only caffeine and dextroamphetamine improved ratings of subjective sleepiness. Conclusions Findi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/29.6.841

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 71

Authors
Killgore, W. D. S., McBride, S. A., Killgore, D. B., & Balkin, T. J.
Affiliations
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Corresponding author
Killgore, William D.S.
Venue
Sleep
Published
2006-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
841-847
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2126773707
Cited by
71
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Defense
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
sleep deprivation, humor appreciation, caffeine, d-amphetamine, modafinil, stimulant medication, executive function, prefrontal cortex, subjective sleepiness, cartoons, verbal humor
MeSH terms
Modafinil, Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Benzhydryl Compounds, Caffeine, Cognition, Dextroamphetamine, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Male, Psychological Tests, Psychomotor Agitation, Sleep Deprivation, Wit and Humor as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review