The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of the Fatigue Severity Scale in a Swiss Cohort
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Fatigue is highly prevalent and has a negative impact on quality of life and performance in a variety of disorders. The 9-item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is one of the most commonly used self-report questionnaires to measure fatigue, but has only been validated in small sample-sized studies and in single disorders. OBJECTIVE: To validate the FSS in healthy subjects and different disorders known to be commonly associated with fatigue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The FSS was administered to 454 healthy subjects, 188 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), 235 patients with recent ischemic stroke, and 429 patients with sleep-wake disorders including narcolepsy with cataplexy (n=22), restless legs syndrome (RLS) (n=79), sleep apnea (n=108), insomnia (n=62), parasomnia (n=25), excessive daytime sleepiness/hypersomnia of other origin (n=84, and other sleep-wake disorders (n=49. RESULTS: FSS scores were 4.66 +/- 1.64 (mean +/- SD) in patients with MS, 3.90 +/- 1.85 in patients after ischemic stroke, and 4.34 +/- 1.64 in patients with sleep-wake disorders. Compared to patients, values were significantly lower in healthy subjects (3.00 +/- 1.08, P < 0.01). Scores did not correlate with gender, age, or education. Item analysis showed an excellent internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.93). Test-retest variability was assessed in 104 healthy subjects, showing stable values over time (2.94 +/- 0.90 vs. 2.90 +/- 0.74; P = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: This first validation of a fatigue scale in a large sample size demonstrates that the FSS is a simple and reliable instrument to assess and quantify fatigue for clinical and research purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Lichstein, K. L., Means, M. K., Noe, S. L., & Aguillard, R. N. (1997) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00029-6 · Cited by 233
Cited by
Naess, H., Lunde, L., & Brogger, J. (2012) · Vascular Health and Risk Management · doi:10.2147/vhrm.s32780 · Cited by 171
Burak, K. W., Swain, M. G., Santodomino-Garzon, T., Lee, S. S., Urbanski, S. J., Aspinall, A. I., Coffin, C. S., & Myers, R. P. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1155/2013/512624 · Cited by 167
Modafinil ameliorates excessive daytime sleepiness after traumatic brain injury
Kaiser, P. R., Valko, P. O., Werth, E., Thomann, J., Meier, J., Stocker, R., Bassetti, C. L., & Baumann, C. R. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181fd62a2 · Cited by 150
Self-citationThe relationship between shift-work, sleep, and mental health among paramedics in Australia
Khan, W. A. A., Conduit, R., Kennedy, G. A., & Jackson, M. L. (2020) · Sleep Health · doi:10.1016/j.sleh.2019.12.002 · Cited by 136
Ferrarelli, F., Smith, R., Dentico, D., Riedner, B. A., Zennig, C., Benca, R. M., Lutz, A., Davidson, R. J., & Tononi, G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073417 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Valko, P. O., Bassetti, C. L., Bloch, K. E., Held, U., & Baumann, C. R.
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1601-1607
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- OpenAlex
- W2159162402
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.