Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To develop an archive of self-report questions assessing sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments (SRI), to develop item banks from this archive, and to validate and calibrate the item banks using classic validation techniques and item response theory analyses in a sample of clinical and community participants. DESIGN: Cross-sectional self-report study. SETTING: Academic medical center and participant homes. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand nine hundred ninety-three adults recruited from an Internet polling sample and 259 adults recruited from medical, psychiatric, and sleep clinics. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: This study was part of PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System), a National Institutes of Health Roadmap initiative. Self-report item banks were developed through an iterative process of literature searches, collecting and sorting items, expert content review, qualitative patient research, and pilot testing. Internal consistency, convergent validity, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were examined in the resulting item banks. Factor analyses identified 2 preliminary item banks, sleep disturbance and SRI. Item response theory analyses and expert content review narrowed the item banks to 27 and 16 items, respectively. Validity of the item banks was supported by moderate to high correlations with existing scales and by significant differences in sleep disturbance and SRI scores between participants with and without sleep disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS sleep disturbance and SRI item banks have excellent measurement properties and may prove to be useful for assessing general aspects of sleep and SRI with various groups of patients and interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although the PROMIS measures have been extensively validated, there is only modest information about their performance specifically in chronic low back pain.
“Extensive effort has been made to validate the PROMIS measures,5, 7, 21, 51, 55, 72, 89, 92, 95 but there is modest information on their performance specifically in the context of cLBP.”
From Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. (2014) · cites this paper as [21]
The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance assessment provides a global measure of sleep rather than focusing on a particular sleep disorder.
“The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance assessment, in particular, reflects a global measure of sleep, rather than focusing on a particular disorder.”
From The association between social media use and sleep disturbance among young adults (2016) · cites this paper as [31]
Previous work has described the development and psychometric testing of the PROMIS sleep disturbance measure among adults aged 18 and older.
“Previous work has described the development and psychometric testing of the PROMIS sleep disturbance measure among individuals age 18 and older. 31;32”
From The association between social media use and sleep disturbance among young adults (2016) · cites this paper as [31]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 850
- Authors
- Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Shablesky-Cade, M. A., & Pilkonis, P. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Louisiana State University in Shreveport (US)
- Corresponding author
- Buysse, Daniel J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 781-792
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- PMC
- PMC2880437
- OpenAlex
- W1489777816
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 14.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- SLEEP (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U01AR052171, U01AR52186, AR052155, U01 AR 52177, U01AR52181, U01AR52155, U01AR052186, U01AR52171, U01AR052170, U01AR052158, U01AR52170, U01AR052155, U01AR052177, U01AR52158, U01AR052181)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- sleep disorders, sleep-related impairment, patient-reported outcome measures, PROMIS, item bank, item response theory, measurement validation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Sleep Wake Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review