Feeling Carcerality: How Carceral Seepage Shapes Racialized Emotions
Abstract
This article examines how young people experience policing and reveals the emotional weight of the carceral state. Drawing on interviews and focus groups with over forty Black and non-Black Latinx young men in Los Angeles County, I argue that the racialized emotions the young men allude to do not stem from one individual encounter with the police or any single identifiable source. Instead, they are responses to the ongoing violence of what I describe as carceral seepage: witnessing the policing of loved ones and peers, the omnipresence of police, and the vulnerability of being criminalized across social contexts (schools, healthcare settings, neighborhood settings, etc.). Integrating theories on racialized emotions and the slow violence of policing, I use carceral seepage to show the breadth of the carceral state and demonstrate how it elicits a particular set of racialized emotional responses (or racialized emotions).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Documentation of genocide at best procures a complex set of racialized emotions from witnessing colonial-carceral violence, at the expense of Palestinians devoting their lives and careers to inducing epiphanies in other people.
“At best, it procures a complex set of racialized emotions that result from witnessing the seepage of colonial-carceral violence play out (Serrano, 2024), at the expense of Palestinians '[devoting] their lives and careers to actively trying to induce epiphanies in other people' (Hammad, 2024, p. 17).”
From Entwined Complicities: Genocidal Geographies of the Youth Carceral State and Arrivals to Educational Abolitionism (2025) · cites this paper as Serrano, 2024
Cites
The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children.
Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, B. A. L., Culotta, C. M., & DiTomasso, N. A. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035663 · Cited by 1,134 · see citing works
Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row
Stuart, F. (2016) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226370958.001.0001 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Hope and Healing in Urban Education
Ginwright, S. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315757025 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies
Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2017) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/1462474516666281 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cabral, B. (2025) · Abolitionist Perspectives in Social Work · doi:10.52713/he1a0v47 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Serrano, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Serrano, Uriel
- ORCID
- Serrano, Uriel
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-10-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-138
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W4403214166
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 18.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Problems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- racialized emotions, carceral state, policing, young Black men, slow violence, criminalization, Los Angeles County
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review