Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Citizens but for Papers:” Undocumented Youth Organizations, Anti-Deportation Campaigns, and the Reframing of Citizenship

Patler, Caitlin·2018·Social Problems

Abstract

Scholars have documented strong anti-immigrant bias in mainstream media portrayals and public sentiment, especially associated with notions of “illegality.” Yet certain groups of undocumented immigrants have been able to defend their continued residency. How are undocumented immigrants, as marginalized subjects, able to make claims for legal and social recognition? Through an analysis of 125 anti-deportation campaigns led by undocumented youth organizations in the United States, I show how organizations developed a nationally coordinated model using citizenship frames to challenge deportations and build support for pro-immigrant legislation. Citizenship frames are based in legal and normative ideologies of citizenship that underscore acculturation, civic engagement, and humanitarian concerns. The campaigns highlight undocumented immigrants’ social integration, deservingness, and practice of citizenship, therefore contesting the boundaries between citizen and noncitizen, and between lawful and unlawful. Though citizenship frames are used across cases, campaign tactics vary: students are portrayed as high-achievers who would suffer greatly if deported, while campaigns for non-students emphasize the detrimental effects of deportation on others. Importantly, citizenship frames are bounded by the government’s priorities for immigration enforcement, with potentially negative consequences for those immigrants considered less than model citizens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/socpro/spw045

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Abrego, 2011, “Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos: Fear and Stigma as Barriers to Claims-Making for First- and 1.5-Generation Immigrants.”, Law & Society Review, 45, 337, 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00435.x · DOI
  2. Alba, 2003, Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration, 10.4159/9780674020115 · DOI
  3. Anderson, 2011, “Citizenship, Deportation and the Boundaries of Belonging.”, Citizenship Studies, 15, 547, 10.1080/13621025.2011.583787 · DOI
  4. Benford, 2000, “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.”, Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611, 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bosniak, 2006, The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership, 10.1515/9781400827510 · DOI
  6. Bosworth, 2011, “Deportation, Detention and Foreign-National Prisoners in England and Wales.”, Citizenship Studies, 15, 583, 10.1080/13621025.2011.583789 · DOI
  7. Brubaker, 1989, Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America
  8. Cebulko, 2014, “Documented, Undocumented, and Liminally Legal: Legal Status During the Transition to Adulthood for 1.5-Generation Brazilian Immigrants.”, The Sociological Quarterly, 55, 143, 10.1111/tsq.12045 · DOI
  9. Chavez, 2008, The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation
  10. Coutin, 2000, “Denationalization, Inclusion, and Exclusion: Negotiating Boundaries of Belonging.”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7, 585
  11. Coutin, 2003, “Suspension of Deportation Hearings and Measures of “Americanness”.”, Journal of Latin American Anthropology, 8, 58, 10.1525/jlca.2003.8.2.58 · DOI
  12. Coutin, 2011, “The Rights of Noncitizens in the United States.”, Annual Review of Law & Social Science, 7, 289, 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105525 · DOI
  13. Covarrubias, 2013, “The Undocumented (Im) Migrant Educational Pipeline: The Influence of Citizenship Status on Educational Attainment for People of Mexican Origin.”, Urban Education, 49, 75, 10.1177/0042085912470468 · DOI
  14. Earl, 2011, Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age, 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015103.001.0001 · DOI
  15. Ebert, 2015, “Legitimating Contexts, Immigrant Power, and Exclusionary Actions.”, Social Problems, 62, 40, 10.1093/socpro/spu006 · DOI
  16. Ellermann, 2009, States against Migrants: Deportation in Germany and the United States, 10.1017/CBO9780511626494 · DOI
  17. Freedman, 2011, “The Réseau Education Sans Frontières: Reframing the Campaign against the Deportation of Migrants.”, Citizenship Studies, 15, 613, 10.1080/13621025.2011.583793 · DOI
  18. Fujiwara, 2005, “Immigrant Rights Are Human Rights: The Reframing of Immigrant Entitlement and Welfare.”, Social Problems, 52, 79, 10.1525/sp.2005.52.1.79 · DOI
  19. Gleeson, 2012, “When Do Papers Matter? An Institutional Analysis of Undocumented Life in the United States.”, International Migration, 50, 1, 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00726.x · DOI
  20. Golash-Boza, 2013, “Latino Immigrant Men and the Deportation Crisis: A Gendered Racial Removal Program.”, Latino Studies, 11, 271, 10.1057/lst.2013.14 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gonzales, 2008, “Left out but Not Shut Down: Political Activism and the Undocumented Student Movement.”, Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, 3, 219
  22. Gonzales, 2011, “Learning to Be Illegal: Undocumented Youth and Shifting Legal Contexts in the Transition to Adulthood.”, American Sociological Review, 76, 602, 10.1177/0003122411411901 · DOI
  23. Immigration Policy Center, 2013, “A Decade of Rising Immigration Enforcement.”
  24. Isin, 2007, Logics of Biowar and the War on Terror, 183
  25. Kasinitz, 2008, Inheriting the City: The Children of Immigrants Come of Age
  26. Keck, 1998, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
  27. Massey, 2002, Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration
  28. Meissner, 2000, “Standard Operating Procedures for Enforcement Officers: Arrest, Detention Processing, and Removal, Part X.”
  29. Menjívar, 2014, Migration, Gender and Social Justice, 325, 10.1007/978-3-642-28012-2_18 · DOI
  30. Morando Lakhani, 2013, “Producing Immigrant Victims’ “Right” to Legal Status and the Management of Legal Uncertainty.”, Law & Social Inquiry, 38, 442, 10.1111/lsi.12022 · DOI
  31. Morton, 2011, “Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion Consistent with the Civil Immigration Enforcement Priorities of the Agency for the Apprehension, Detention, and Removal of Aliens.”
  32. Motomura, 2014, Immigration Outside the Law
  33. Nakano Glenn, 2011, “Constructing Citizenship: Exclusion, Subordination, and Resistance.”, American Sociological Review, 76, 1, 10.1177/0003122411398443 · DOI
  34. Napolitano, 2012, “Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children.”
  35. Ngai, 2004, Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America
  36. Nicholls, 2013, The Dreamers: How the Undocumented Youth Movement Transformed the Immigrant Rights Debate, 10.1515/9780804788694 · DOI
  37. Passel, 2011, “Unauthorized Immigration Population: National and State Trends, 2010.”
  38. Patler, 2015, “Framing Citizenship: Media Coverage of Anti-Deportation Cases Led by Undocumented Immigrant Youth Organizations.”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41, 1453, 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1021587 · DOI
  39. Portes, 2001, Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation
  40. Rincón, 2008, Undocumented Immigrations and Higher Education: Sí Se Puede!
  41. Santa Ana, 2013, Juan in a Hundred: The Representation of Latinos on Network News
  42. Schwiertz, 2016, “Transformations of the Undocumented Youth Movement and Radical Egalitarian Citizenship.”, Citizenship Studies, 20, 610, 10.1080/13621025.2016.1182680 · DOI
  43. Seif, 2004, “'Wise Up!' Undocumented Latino Youth, Mexican-American Legislators, and the Struggle for Higher Education Access.”, Latino Studies, 2, 210, 10.1057/palgrave.lst.8600080 · DOI
  44. Stewart, 2015, “The Social Context of Latino Threat and Punitive Latino Sentiment.”, Social Problems, 62, 68, 10.1093/socpro/spu002 · DOI
  45. Stumpf, 2006, “The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power.”, American University Law Review, 56, 367
  46. Valdivia Ordorica, 2015, Undocumented Latino Youth : Navigating Their Worlds, 163
  47. Welch, 2011, “The Typification of Hispanics as Criminals and Support for Punitive Crime Control Policies.”, Social Science Research, 40, 822, 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.09.012 · DOI
  48. Yukich, 2013, “Constructing the Model Immigrant: Movement Strategy and Immigrant Deservingness in the New Sanctuary Movement.”, Social Problems, 60, 302, 10.1525/sp.2013.60.3.302 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Patler, C.
Affiliations
University of California at Davis
Venue
Social Problems
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
96-115
ISSN
  • 0037-7791
  • 1533-8533
Cited by
50
References
4
Language
en
Funders
National Science Foundation (DGE-0707424)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review