Cited by 12Social and Intergroup PsychologyMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationSocial Capital and Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Technology and Tolerance in Japan: Internet Use and Positive Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Foreigners

SEEBRUCK, R.·2013·Social Science Japan Journal

Abstract

To explore the relationship between Internet use and social tolerance in Japan, I draw on the contact hypothesis, which argues of the positive effects of exposure to diverse others on intergroup tolerance. Logistic regression results of the 2003 Japanese General Social Survey data show that Internet use is positively associated with both attitudinal and behavioral tolerance toward foreigners: Internet users are more likely to support an increase in foreigners in their community and to befriend them. Critics of the contact hypothesis question its ability to parse out selection bias: i.e. tolerance leads to contact and not vice versa. That Internet use remains significant after controlling for both a propensity for tolerance and offline contact with a foreigner suggests a strong relationship between online activity and social tolerance. However, data limitations preclude the ability to determine the causal direction between Internet use and tolerance. Thus, these findings should be interpreted as suggestive rather than definitive.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ssjj/jyt017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Andrews, 1979, American Sociological Review, 44, 298, 10.2307/2094512 · DOI
  2. 1984, Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 74, 10.2307/3033890 · DOI
  3. Desforges, 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology, 60, 531, 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.531 · DOI
  4. 2001, DISKURS, 11, 16
  5. 2009, Journal of Communication, 59, 676, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2001, 82, 51, 10.1111/0038-4941.00006 · DOI
  7. 2007, JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, 33, 419, 10.1080/13691830701234533 · DOI
  8. 2004, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF JAPANESE SOCIOLOGY, 13, 53, 10.1111/j.1475-6781.2004.00053.x · DOI
  9. 2002, IT SOCIETY, 1, 166
  10. 2011, COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 27, 971, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001 · DOI
  11. 2010, Human Communication Research, 36, 546, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01388.x · DOI
  12. 1988, HOSEI DAIGAKU KYOYOBU KIYO, 6, 1
  13. Kraut, 1998, The American Psychologist, 53, 1017, 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lee, 2004, American Sociological Review, 69, 40, 10.1177/000312240406900104 · DOI
  15. Melican, 2008, Communication Research, 35, 151, 10.1177/0093650207313157 · DOI
  16. 1986, 30, 214, 10.2307/2111302 · DOI
  17. 2005, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF JAPANESE SOCIOLOGY, 16, 80
  18. 2003, IT SOCIETY, 1, 14
  19. 2002, IT SOCIETY, 1, 275
  20. 2006, JAPANESE GENERAL SOCIAL SURVEYS JGSS RESEARCH SERIES, 2, 191
  21. Parks, 1998, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517, 10.1177/0265407598154005 · DOI
  22. Pettigrew, 1997, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173, 10.1177/0146167297232006 · DOI
  23. Robinson, 2000, Social Science Computer Review, 18, 490, 10.1177/089443930001800411 · DOI
  24. 2002, IT SOCIETY, 1, 284
  25. 1967, Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 194, 10.1086/267513 · DOI
  26. 2010, Journal of Communication, 60, 556, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2009, POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 30, 591, 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.x · DOI
  28. Wagner, 1989, Human Relations, 42, 561, 10.1177/001872678904200701 · DOI
  29. 2001, POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 22, 639, 10.1111/0162-895X.00257 · DOI
  30. 2006, TAIWANESE SOCIOLOGY, 12, 191
  31. 1968, JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY MONOGRAPH SUPPLEMENT, 9, 1
  32. 2006, JOURNAL OF COMPUTERMEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 11, 844

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
SEEBRUCK, R.
Corresponding author
SEEBRUCK, R.
Venue
Social Science Japan Journal
Published
2013-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
279-300
ISSN
  • 1369-1465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2680
OpenAlex
W2019589108
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science Japan Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
Keywords
internet use, social tolerance, attitudes toward foreigners, contact hypothesis, intergroup relations, online contact, selection bias, Japanese public opinion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review