The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In-home family-focused reunification: A six-year follow-up of a successful experiment
Abstract
The services provided to 120 children (62 experimental and 58 control) by state welfare agencies were followed for six years. When identified initially, all of the children were in out-of-home placements. After a 12-month follow-up of an experimental 90-day intensive in-home, family-based intervention, 75 percent of the children in the experimental group were reunified with their families, compared with 49 percent of the children in the control group who received routine child welfare services. Over six years, using state computer databases, it was determined that the children in the experimental group required less supervision time, lived at home longer, and were in less-restrictive placements than those in the control group. At the time all public agency involvement was terminated, two-thirds of the experimental families were classified as “stabilized,” compared with approximately one-third of the control group. The experimental treatment had a substantial effect on families, which continued throughout the six-year follow-up period.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Strengthening interpersonal relationships between youth and caregivers bolsters a youth’s social competence and behavioral adjustment, reduces caregiver stress, and supports family reunification [7,8].”
Citations
Cites
Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., & Smith, L. A. (1992) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.60.6.953 · Cited by 909
The Reunification Process in Substitute Care
Goerge, R. M. (1990) · Social Service Review · doi:10.1086/603780 · Cited by 189
Effectiveness of family preservation services
Fräser, M. W., Nelson, K. E., & Rivard, J. C. (1997) · Social Work Research · doi:10.1093/swr/21.3.138 · Cited by 131
Keeping Families Together: The Homebuilders Model
Kinney, J. M., Haapala, D. A., & Booth, C. (1991) · Cited by 115
An experiment in family reunification: Correlates of outcomes at one-year follow-up
Fräser, M. W., Walton, E., Lewis, R. E., Pecora, P. J., & Walton, W. K. (1996) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/0190-7409(96)00009-6 · Cited by 114
Self-citationIn-home family-focused reunification: an experimental study.
Walton, E., Fräser, M. W., Lewis, R. E., Pecora, P. J., & Walton, W. K. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 95
Self-citationCaseload Dynamics and Foster Care Reentry
Wulczyn, F. (1991) · Social Service Review · doi:10.1086/603820 · Cited by 81
Alternative Models of Family Preservation: Family-Based Services in Context
Lamke, L. K., Nelson, K. E., & Landsman, M. J. (1993) · Family Relations · doi:10.2307/585354 · Cited by 74
Family reunification of children in out-of-home care: Research perspectives
Maluccio, A. N., Abramczyk, L. W., & Thomlison, B. (1996) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/0190-7409(96)00007-2 · Cited by 58
Rossi, P. H. (1992) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/0190-7409(92)90022-n · Cited by 55
Cited by
Barth, R. P., Landsverk, J., Chamberlain, P., Reid, J. B., Rolls, J. A., Hurlburt, M. S., Farmer, E. M. Z., James, S., McCabe, K. M., & Kohl, P. L. (2005) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731505276321 · Cited by 269
Housing problems experienced by recipients of child welfare services.
Courtney, M. E., McMurtry, S. L., & Zinn, A. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 122
Alpert, L. T. (2005) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00387.x · Cited by 96
Berrick, J. D., Cohen, E., & Anthony, E. K. (2011) · Journal of Family Strengths · doi:10.58464/2168-670x.1011 · Cited by 64
Antle, B. F., Christensen, D. N., van Zyl, M. A., & Barbee, A. P. (2012) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.10.009 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Walton, E.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Walton, E.
- Venue
- Social Work Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 205-214
- ISSN
- 1070-5309 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6838
- OpenAlex
- W1964019377
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Work Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
- Keywords
- family reunification, out-of-home placement, child welfare services, home-based intervention, family intervention, foster care, long-term follow-up, child protection services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
