The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Unifying Model for the Analysis of Phenotypic, Genetic, and Geographic Data
Open accessAbstract
Recognition of evolutionary units (species, populations) requires integrating several kinds of data, such as genetic or phenotypic markers or spatial information in order to get a comprehensive view concerning the differentiation of the units. We propose a statistical model with a double original advantage: (i) it incorporates information about the spatial distribution of the samples, with the aim to increase inference power and to relate more explicitly observed patterns to geography and (ii) it allows one to analyze genetic and phenotypic data within a unified model and inference framework, thus opening the way to robust comparisons between markers and possibly combined analyses. We show from simulated data as well as real data that our method estimates parameters accurately and is an improvement over alternative approaches in many situations. The power of this method is exemplified using an intricate case of inter- and intraspecies differentiation based on an original data set of georeferenced genetic and morphometric markers obtained on Myodes voles from Sweden. A computer program is made available as an extension of the R package Geneland.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344
Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data
Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913022107 · Cited by 1,405
Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population
COULON, A., GUILLOT, G., COSSON, J. ‐., ANGIBAULT, J. M. A., AULAGNIER, S., CARGNELUTTI, B., GALAN, M., & HEWISON, A. J. M. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02861.x · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Cited by
How to fail at species delimitation
Carstens, B. C., Pelletier, T. A., Reid, N. M., & Satler, J. D. (2013) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12413 · Cited by 1,248
Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept
Fišer, C., Robinson, C. T., & Malard, F. (2018) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14486 · Cited by 574
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillot, G., Renaud, S., Ledevin, R., Michaux, J., & Claude, J.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03-06
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 897-911
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2165484512
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
