Cited by 415Morphological variations and asymmetryEvolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Evolutionary Covariation in Geometric Morphometric Data: Analyzing Integration, Modularity, and Allometry in a Phylogenetic Context

Klingenberg, Christian Peter, Marugán-Lobón, Jesús·2013·Systematic Biology

Abstract

Quantifying integration and modularity of evolutionary changes in morphometric traits is crucial for understanding how organismal shapes evolve. For this purpose, comparative studies are necessary, which need to take into account the phylogenetic structure of interspecific data. This study applies several of the standard tools of geometric morphometrics, which mostly have been used in intraspecific studies, in the new context of analyzing integration and modularity based on comparative data. Morphometric methods such as principal component analysis, multivariate regression, partial least squares, and modularity tests can be applied to phylogenetically independent contrasts of shape data. We illustrate this approach in an analysis of cranial evolution in 160 species from all orders of birds. Mapping the shape information onto the phylogeny indicates that there is a significant phylogenetic signal in skull shape. Multivariate regression of independent contrasts of shape on independent contrasts of size reveals clear evolutionary allometry. Regardless of whether or not a correction for allometry is used, evolutionary integration between the face and braincase is strong, and tests reject the hypothesis that the face and braincase are separate evolutionary modules. These analyses can easily be applied to other taxa and can be combined with other morphometric tools to address a wide range of questions about evolutionary patterns and processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sysbio/syt025

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous analyses that found the avian cranium to be highly integrated were restricted to smaller clades or excluded large portions of the skull.

    “This contrasts with previous analyses that have found the avian cranium to be highly integrated. However, these previous analyses have been restricted to analyzing smaller clades (10, 12) or have excluded large portions of the skull (9).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klingenberg, C. P., & Marugán-Lobón, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; and 2Unidad de Paleontología, Departamento de Biología, C/Darwin 2, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Venue
Systematic Biology
Published
2013-05-31
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
591-610
ISSN
  • 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1076-836X
OpenAlex
W2124479010
Cited by
415
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 6
FWCI
46.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Systematic Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
morphological integration, modularity, evolutionary allometry, cranial evolution, skull shape, birds, phylogenetically independent contrasts, phylogenetic signal
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Skull, Multivariate Analysis, Least-Squares Analysis, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review